Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8889591" data-attributes="member: 683408">OK, so you want to talk about fire control and prevention in general, and how the Democrats do it wrong.Got it.I&#039;m trying to find the post where I said it is OK to not have fire breaks. Can you reference the post number? No, you can&#039;t. Because I never said it. What I said was that you blaming the fire breaks (or lack thereof) for the intensity of these fires is inaccurate. Pretty much every expert has said that the winds were the main issue with being able to control the fires. But I&#039;m sure all those experts were just shills for Newsom, trying to make Trump and Vance look bad by contradicting their claims. &quot;Anything to defend Team Blue&quot;, while you have remained conspicuously silent on the&nbsp; ~3,000,000 burned acres, over 6,000 destroyed structures, and ~50 people being killed by wildfires under the previous Republican administration.If Republicans are so much better, why did it happen then?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8889591, member: 683408"] OK, so you want to talk about fire control and prevention in general, and how the Democrats do it wrong. Got it. I'm trying to find the post where I said it is OK to not have fire breaks. Can you reference the post number? No, you can't. Because I never said it. What I said was that you blaming the fire breaks (or lack thereof) for the intensity of these fires is inaccurate. Pretty much every expert has said that the winds were the main issue with being able to control the fires. But I'm sure all those experts were just shills for Newsom, trying to make Trump and Vance look bad by contradicting their claims. "Anything to defend Team Blue", while you have remained conspicuously silent on the ~3,000,000 burned acres, over 6,000 destroyed structures, and ~50 people being killed by wildfires under the previous Republican administration. If Republicans are so much better, why did it happen then? [/QUOTE]

Verification