Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8889587" data-attributes="member: 673702"><p>What is with you? Please show me where I've brought up the fire breaks multiple times in explaining how Newsom is at fault for the extent of fires. </p><p></p><p>Fire breaks may or may not be irrelevant to the discussion of THESE fires, but they are certainly are relevant to the massive mismanagement and neglect going on in California. The fact that you think it's okay not to have fire breaks because these fires may or not have gotten out of hand regardless is absolutely astonishing. What if the fire broke out and there were no Santa Ana winds to drive it? What if the fire broke out an it rained the next day to bring it under control? That means not doing your fvckin' job is acceptable? Anything to defend Team Blue, eh? </p><p></p><p>Colorado's Federal Forests are under a "shared stewardship" program where both the state and fed manage the forests or more accurately mismanage them. I won't blame Biden for the state of Colorado's forests because I honestly believe he doesn't have a clue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8889587, member: 673702"] What is with you? Please show me where I've brought up the fire breaks multiple times in explaining how Newsom is at fault for the extent of fires. Fire breaks may or may not be irrelevant to the discussion of THESE fires, but they are certainly are relevant to the massive mismanagement and neglect going on in California. The fact that you think it's okay not to have fire breaks because these fires may or not have gotten out of hand regardless is absolutely astonishing. What if the fire broke out and there were no Santa Ana winds to drive it? What if the fire broke out an it rained the next day to bring it under control? That means not doing your fvckin' job is acceptable? Anything to defend Team Blue, eh? Colorado's Federal Forests are under a "shared stewardship" program where both the state and fed manage the forests or more accurately mismanage them. I won't blame Biden for the state of Colorado's forests because I honestly believe he doesn't have a clue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list