Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8889568" data-attributes="member: 683408">You have brought up firebreaks multiple times in explaining how Newsom is at fault for the extent of the fires. Then YOU called them a &quot;strawman&quot;, then YOU brought them up again.Firebreaks are irrelevant to the discussion of THESE fires. And you said they are a strawman. I&#039;m not telling you what you are allowed to say, but why bring up an irrelevant point over and over? It only serves to weaken your argument.OK. So you want the discussion to be more about how the Cali gov&#039;t has failed, as opposed to how it failed in the context of these fires.Would you say that failing to prevent over 3,000,000 acres from burning, over 6,000 structures from being destroyed, and ~50 people being killed by wildfires is a bad thing?That&#039;s scary. Tinderbox like our boundary water area a few years after a major blowdown.How much of Colorado&#039;s forests are federally managed?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8889568, member: 683408"] You have brought up firebreaks multiple times in explaining how Newsom is at fault for the extent of the fires. Then YOU called them a "strawman", then YOU brought them up again. Firebreaks are irrelevant to the discussion of THESE fires. And you said they are a strawman. I'm not telling you what you are allowed to say, but why bring up an irrelevant point over and over? It only serves to weaken your argument. OK. So you want the discussion to be more about how the Cali gov't has failed, as opposed to how it failed in the context of these fires. Would you say that failing to prevent over 3,000,000 acres from burning, over 6,000 structures from being destroyed, and ~50 people being killed by wildfires is a bad thing? That's scary. Tinderbox like our boundary water area a few years after a major blowdown. How much of Colorado's forests are federally managed? [/QUOTE]

Verification