Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8888053" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Repetition doesn't make truth, no matter how hard you try. </p><p>Not that Hornady has any experience with ammo, but this is what they have to say about it: "the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin"</p><p></p><p>Maybe you should contact them and let them know the error of their ways. </p><p>Perhaps they'd hire you as their in-house expert advisor. </p><p></p><p>"Loaded to spec". What is the "spec" load for a 5.56 intended to be used in a rifle chambered for .223 ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8888053, member: 683408"] Repetition doesn't make truth, no matter how hard you try. Not that Hornady has any experience with ammo, but this is what they have to say about it: "the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin" Maybe you should contact them and let them know the error of their ways. Perhaps they'd hire you as their in-house expert advisor. "Loaded to spec". What is the "spec" load for a 5.56 intended to be used in a rifle chambered for .223 ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
