Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8887924" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>The FBI handled the surgery? Interesting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which post of yours would you like to see the proof from?</p><p></p><p>"It" being history. The term I used that you later described as changing based on my opinion.</p><p></p><p>According to Ronnie Jackson (former White House Physician): <em>"Jackson has previously said that Trump was shot in the ear creating a 2cm-wide wound, according to a memo shared with <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/07/20/trump-ear-injury-shooting-update-jackson" target="_blank"><em>Axios</em></a>."</em></p><p><em>"Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place," Jackson said Saturday. "Given the broad and blunt nature of the wound itself, no sutures were required."</em></p><p>Still bleeding spontaneously on July 20th, healed without a trace of injury by first week of August.</p><p>Superman!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I suppose he didn't say it was the lobe that was hit?</p><p></p><p>Funny how you went pretty much silent when I was gone for a while, then started posting again the moment I came back.</p><p>Seems the stalker might be you.</p><p></p><p>It wasn't my claim. It was a claim posted in this thread. With a picture to prove the claim.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. You tell us that whenever you post.</p><p></p><p>A missing chunk would take longer to heal than a split. Show me a split that healed without a trace in a few weeks time, then we can talk about a missing chunk healing that fast.</p><p></p><p>So the FBI can tell that a bullet and not shrapnel or a belt buckle caused what you describe as a scratch on his ear? A scratch that was spontaneously bleeding as of July 20th, but healed without a trace by the first week of August?</p><p>What are the telltale signs?</p><p></p><p>A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223.</p><p>Try some education before you spout off about things you don't know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8887924, member: 683408"] The FBI handled the surgery? Interesting. Which post of yours would you like to see the proof from? "It" being history. The term I used that you later described as changing based on my opinion. According to Ronnie Jackson (former White House Physician): [I]"Jackson has previously said that Trump was shot in the ear creating a 2cm-wide wound, according to a memo shared with [URL='https://www.axios.com/2024/07/20/trump-ear-injury-shooting-update-jackson'][I]Axios[/I][/URL]." "Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place," Jackson said Saturday. "Given the broad and blunt nature of the wound itself, no sutures were required."[/I] Still bleeding spontaneously on July 20th, healed without a trace of injury by first week of August. Superman! And I suppose he didn't say it was the lobe that was hit? Funny how you went pretty much silent when I was gone for a while, then started posting again the moment I came back. Seems the stalker might be you. It wasn't my claim. It was a claim posted in this thread. With a picture to prove the claim. Nope. You tell us that whenever you post. A missing chunk would take longer to heal than a split. Show me a split that healed without a trace in a few weeks time, then we can talk about a missing chunk healing that fast. So the FBI can tell that a bullet and not shrapnel or a belt buckle caused what you describe as a scratch on his ear? A scratch that was spontaneously bleeding as of July 20th, but healed without a trace by the first week of August? What are the telltale signs? A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223. Try some education before you spout off about things you don't know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
