Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8887540" data-attributes="member: 683408">I guess you consider referring to facts, evidence, proofs, as speaking from an &quot;echo chamber&quot;?What is your opinion of these two sides of a debate?:&quot;Trump said China and Mexico will pay the import tariffs for goods we buy from China and Mexico, so that is truth. You are not an importer if you buy goods from a manufacturer in China, and they are shipped here.&quot;&quot;Import tariffs are paid by an importer, per Federal Regulation and per information posted directly on the US Government&#039;s Customs and Border Protection website. Additionally, they define an importer as &#039;The importer of record (IOR) is the owner or purchaser of the goods, or a licensed customs broker designated by the owner, purchaser, or consignee.&quot;Which of them would would you consider emanating from an &quot;echo chamber&quot;?Which one would you consider to be objective, which one subjective?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8887540, member: 683408"] I guess you consider referring to facts, evidence, proofs, as speaking from an "echo chamber"? What is your opinion of these two sides of a debate?: "Trump said China and Mexico will pay the import tariffs for goods we buy from China and Mexico, so that is truth. You are not an importer if you buy goods from a manufacturer in China, and they are shipped here." "Import tariffs are paid by an importer, per Federal Regulation and per information posted directly on the US Government's Customs and Border Protection website. Additionally, they define an importer as [U][I]'The importer of record (IOR) is the owner or purchaser of the goods, or a licensed customs broker designated by the owner, purchaser, or consignee[/I][/U]." Which of them would would you consider emanating from an "echo chamber"? Which one would you consider to be objective, which one subjective? [/QUOTE]

Verification