Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8887397" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Interesting sidestep, and not relevant to incomes increasing over time.</p><p>Keep the goalpoast in place, and explain how people are buying $100,000 trucks today, if increasing wages have nothing to do with the changing nominal prices of goods.</p><p></p><p>I know what you've told us of your finances, which is that you got a settlement for an "injury" on a governemtn job site, and that you live off that settlement and the good will of family members who let you crash on their couch, and that you only work in order to get extra beer money or stave off "boredom".</p><p></p><p>I am glad you can at least understand $4 is two dollars more than $2. Did you also know that $66,621 is more than $50,321 ?</p><p>Assuming you are referencing gas price again, why are you paying $4, when gas is $2.87 in your city?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]62284[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Not by your logic. Remember, YOU are the one who said he will deny edited videos. Your words, since you forgot: <em>"One, the edited videos, clearly were used to bash Trump. That is why I will deny the Jan 6th Videos."</em></p><p>But now you want to flip the script and use edited videos to support your claim that the fucktard "shaman" didn't do what he pleaded guilty to doing?</p><p>Funny how that works.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. You said he pleaded to a lesser charge. WHAT WAS THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGE THAT HE PLEADED DOWN FROM?</p><p>Stop moving goalposts and support your claim.</p><p>NAME THE CHARGE IN THE GROUP YOU PROVIDED, THAT WAS MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONE HE PLEADED GUILTY TO.</p><p></p><p>The justice system determined the outcome. That's how it works in this country. My opinion has no effect on the legal decisions reached in the case.</p><p>Are you new here? Do you actually live here? Do you know how a court case works, even on the most basic level?</p><p></p><p>No proof exists for me to "accept". You can have 3 billion people tell me you built a working perpetual motion machine. Until you can demonstrate one publicly, I'm not going to believe it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>To prove a lack of existence for something that doesn't exist?</p><p>Interesting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You can thank Biden for that, I guess.</p><p></p><p>Trump failed because half the country didn't vote for him? Wow, what a pathetic leader he is. A good leader would say "I'm in charge now, and I WILL succceed". But Trump just gave up.</p><p>What a loser.</p><p></p><p>How would that change the vote that was locked in two months prior? Did you think they would do another election if a bunch of ******* idiot Republicans stormed the Capitol?</p><p>Explain the thought process and the expected outcome of what the fucktards did.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So you brought it up just to share some information that was not relevant to the events of Jan 6th in any way?</p><p>You go off on non sequiturs a lot. Is it an ADHD issue, or just being slow-minded?</p><p></p><p></p><p>And the relevance to the events of Jan 6th IS?</p><p></p><p>I'm not POTUS, not do I intend to run for office. How does that change the idea someone who thinks "fight like hell" means wearing a hat, should not be in charge of our military?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Had Harris not lost 7M votes (in itself pretty damn odd), Trump's 2.5M vote gain would not have helped him.</p><p></p><p>But, I hope you'll all be happy suffering in order to "own the libs".</p><p>I just read that 82% of "Obamacare" applicants are in red states. And now you'll have your orange man in office to eliminate it.</p><p>You can also watch him force the cost of living up if he implements the 20-25% import tariffs he so desperately wants.</p><p>But at least you'll get your wish for the expansion of Communism when he stops helping Ukraine fight back against Russian takeover.</p><p>Good job!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8887397, member: 683408"] Interesting sidestep, and not relevant to incomes increasing over time. Keep the goalpoast in place, and explain how people are buying $100,000 trucks today, if increasing wages have nothing to do with the changing nominal prices of goods. I know what you've told us of your finances, which is that you got a settlement for an "injury" on a governemtn job site, and that you live off that settlement and the good will of family members who let you crash on their couch, and that you only work in order to get extra beer money or stave off "boredom". I am glad you can at least understand $4 is two dollars more than $2. Did you also know that $66,621 is more than $50,321 ? Assuming you are referencing gas price again, why are you paying $4, when gas is $2.87 in your city? [ATTACH type="full" width="166px" alt="1735673809045.png"]62284[/ATTACH] Not by your logic. Remember, YOU are the one who said he will deny edited videos. Your words, since you forgot: [I]"One, the edited videos, clearly were used to bash Trump. That is why I will deny the Jan 6th Videos."[/I] But now you want to flip the script and use edited videos to support your claim that the fucktard "shaman" didn't do what he pleaded guilty to doing? Funny how that works. Nope. You said he pleaded to a lesser charge. WHAT WAS THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGE THAT HE PLEADED DOWN FROM? Stop moving goalposts and support your claim. NAME THE CHARGE IN THE GROUP YOU PROVIDED, THAT WAS MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONE HE PLEADED GUILTY TO. The justice system determined the outcome. That's how it works in this country. My opinion has no effect on the legal decisions reached in the case. Are you new here? Do you actually live here? Do you know how a court case works, even on the most basic level? No proof exists for me to "accept". You can have 3 billion people tell me you built a working perpetual motion machine. Until you can demonstrate one publicly, I'm not going to believe it. To prove a lack of existence for something that doesn't exist? Interesting. You can thank Biden for that, I guess. Trump failed because half the country didn't vote for him? Wow, what a pathetic leader he is. A good leader would say "I'm in charge now, and I WILL succceed". But Trump just gave up. What a loser. How would that change the vote that was locked in two months prior? Did you think they would do another election if a bunch of ******* idiot Republicans stormed the Capitol? Explain the thought process and the expected outcome of what the fucktards did. So you brought it up just to share some information that was not relevant to the events of Jan 6th in any way? You go off on non sequiturs a lot. Is it an ADHD issue, or just being slow-minded? And the relevance to the events of Jan 6th IS? I'm not POTUS, not do I intend to run for office. How does that change the idea someone who thinks "fight like hell" means wearing a hat, should not be in charge of our military? Had Harris not lost 7M votes (in itself pretty damn odd), Trump's 2.5M vote gain would not have helped him. But, I hope you'll all be happy suffering in order to "own the libs". I just read that 82% of "Obamacare" applicants are in red states. And now you'll have your orange man in office to eliminate it. You can also watch him force the cost of living up if he implements the 20-25% import tariffs he so desperately wants. But at least you'll get your wish for the expansion of Communism when he stops helping Ukraine fight back against Russian takeover. Good job! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list