Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8886304" data-attributes="member: 683408">The whole decision: <a href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html" target="_blank">https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html</a>A verbatim quote FROM that decision:&quot;The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.&quot;I&#039;ll repeat the important part about the ****, in case the sheer quantity of words overwhelmed you: the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly thatSeriously, how the **** can you even ATTEMPT to argue that this is not real? Have your caretaker help you if needed, but show me where the decision has been changed.Until you do, your arguments are simply a mentally ill person shouting at a cloud.YOUR words, VERBATIM: &quot;Unless I see it with my own eyes I cannot say without a doubt that a **** occurred.&quot;The word &quot;see&quot; and the words &quot;my own eyes&quot; are rather important here, no?Or is that rule for anyone else that is *****, but not your daughter? Do you apply it selectively?Nope. Packaging up stuff I sold online. Grandmas have been dead for 25 years and 55 years.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8886304, member: 683408"] The whole decision: [URL]https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html[/URL] A verbatim quote FROM that decision: [I]"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law [B]does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her[/B] as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed,[U] [B]as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that[/B].[/U]"[/I] I'll repeat the important part about the ****, in case the sheer quantity of words overwhelmed you: [I][U][B]the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that[/B][/U][/I] Seriously, how the **** can you even ATTEMPT to argue that this is not real? Have your caretaker help you if needed, but show me where the decision has been changed. Until you do, your arguments are simply a mentally ill person shouting at a cloud. YOUR words, VERBATIM: [I]"Unless I see it with my own eyes I cannot say without a doubt that a **** occurred."[/I] The word [I]"see"[/I] and the words [I]"my own eyes"[/I] are rather important here, no? Or is that rule for anyone else that is *****, but not your daughter? Do you apply it selectively? Nope. Packaging up stuff I sold online. Grandmas have been dead for 25 years and 55 years. [/QUOTE]

Verification