Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8886272" data-attributes="member: 683408">So you dislike me enough that you will back up ThxOne when he lies and claims I &quot;misquoted&quot; him in my sig line?OK, let&#039;s run with it.1. Show me where I offered any explanation of what his words meant.2. Show me where any of the words in quotation marks were not a verbatim, word-for-word, exact copy, of the words he originally typed in his post.The words mean the same thing with or without the &quot;Your&quot;. An average that is derived from a set of numbers is not &quot;mine&quot; in any way. It is a mathematical certainty. The calculation to find an average is also not &quot;mine&quot; in any way.Additionally, he was describing an average reached by adding 2 and 3 together, and dividing by 2.Neither 2 nor 3 are &quot;mine&quot;, nor is the calculation.&quot;Your&quot; matters not a whit with regards to the verbatim quote in my sig line.Should we get into the fact that he felt the need to explain people don&#039;t get &quot;half a child&quot; when the average number of children in a home is not a whole number?[ATTACH=full]62046[/ATTACH]And was talking about averages and math in general. He clarified it here: &quot;That is YOUR spin on what I post. What I post is that math can ALSO be used nefariously.&quot;Actually, it does. The decision exists regardless of the motivation of the judge, the jury, the failure of Trump&#039;s attorneys to hire ThxOne for his stellar defense capabilities, the day of week the decisions occurred, the phase of the moon, the color of the carpet in the judge&#039;s chamber.Unless the decision is changed or overturned, the decision is locked in. Nobody&#039;s personal opinion changes that.Just like ThxOne&#039;s personal opinion doesn&#039;t change the definitions of &quot;in&quot;, or &quot;irony&quot;, &quot;tautology&quot;, or &quot;verbatim&quot;.I posted a link to the legal decision several times, with quotes taken directly from within the decision itself. The quotes from that decision indicate that Trump is legally considered a ****** by court decision.I posted this after calling him a ******, and Spokey challenged my use of the word.He wanted proof. I gave him proof. And then he spent a ton of posts trying to spin out of the reality of the legal decision. But he never showed that the decision was changed of overturned.So it stands.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8886272, member: 683408"] So you dislike me enough that you will back up ThxOne when he lies and claims I "misquoted" him in my sig line? OK, let's run with it. 1. Show me where I offered any explanation of what his words meant. 2. Show me where any of the words in quotation marks were not a verbatim, word-for-word, exact copy, of the words he originally typed in his post. The words mean the same thing with or without the "Your". An average that is derived from a set of numbers is not "mine" in any way. It is a mathematical certainty. The calculation to find an average is also not "mine" in any way. Additionally, he was describing an average reached by adding 2 and 3 together, and dividing by 2. Neither 2 nor 3 are "mine", nor is the calculation. "Your" matters not a whit with regards to the verbatim quote in my sig line. Should we get into the fact that he felt the need to explain people don't get "half a child" when the average number of children in a home is not a whole number? [ATTACH type="full" width="726px"]62046[/ATTACH] And was talking about averages and math in general. He clarified it here: [I]"That is YOUR spin on what I post. What I post is that math can ALSO be used nefariously."[/I] Actually, it does. The decision exists regardless of the motivation of the judge, the jury, the failure of Trump's attorneys to hire ThxOne for his stellar defense capabilities, the day of week the decisions occurred, the phase of the moon, the color of the carpet in the judge's chamber. Unless the decision is changed or overturned, the decision is locked in. Nobody's personal opinion changes that. Just like ThxOne's personal opinion doesn't change the definitions of "in", or "irony", "tautology", or "verbatim". I posted a link to the legal decision several times, with quotes taken directly from within the decision itself. The quotes from that decision indicate that Trump is legally considered a ****** by court decision. I posted this after calling him a ******, and Spokey challenged my use of the word. He wanted proof. I gave him proof. And then he spent a ton of posts trying to spin out of the reality of the legal decision. But he never showed that the decision was changed of overturned. So it stands. [/QUOTE]

Verification