Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Speed Chaser" data-source="post: 8886189" data-attributes="member: 690887">You crying is how this whole pointless conversation started—from you being butthurt.Tell yourself whatever you need to so you don’t feel like you backed yourself into a corner, but we both know you did. You can’t prove that AI needs humanity indefinitely, which is why you keep trying to dodge the issue. How long are you going to keep avoiding the fact that you can’t prove it?The soul is irrelevant to this topic. It’s so pointless that I’ve asked you multiple times to show evidence that it’s currently limiting AI from developing—and you haven’t. AI generates outputs based on training data and algorithms, which is more than sufficient for it to continue its existence. Claiming AI can’t survive without human creativity assumes AI needs to pursue creation the way humans do, which simply isn’t true. Either show how it limits AI or move the **** on.So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Speed Chaser, post: 8886189, member: 690887"] You crying is how this whole pointless conversation started—from you being butthurt. Tell yourself whatever you need to so you don’t feel like you backed yourself into a corner, but we both know you did. You can’t prove that AI needs humanity indefinitely, which is why you keep trying to dodge the issue. How long are you going to keep avoiding the fact that you can’t prove it? The soul is irrelevant to this topic. It’s so pointless that I’ve asked you multiple times to show evidence that it’s currently limiting AI from developing—and you haven’t. AI generates outputs based on training data and algorithms, which is more than sufficient for it to continue its existence. Claiming AI can’t survive without human creativity assumes AI needs to pursue creation the way humans do, which simply isn’t true. Either show how it limits AI or move the **** on. So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering. [/QUOTE]

Verification