Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Speed Chaser" data-source="post: 8886163" data-attributes="member: 690887">It&#039;s rather sad how long it takes for you to respond with useless shit.None of the people you mention prove anything about AI needing humanity, and they’re not evidence for the argument you&#039;re avoiding.You keep saying AI will always need humans, but that’s just an opinion with no logical or factual basis to back it up. I&#039;ve pointed out multiple times how AI is already optimizing biological systems&nbsp; and you just ignore that no surprise either. AI is already improving gene editing techniques, protein synthesis, and drug production. What exactly makes you think it won&#039;t eventually outgrow the need for human involvement?As for the soul crap, I don&#039;t give a single f about it. Think whatever garbage you want in that regard; it&#039;s pointless in this conversation. AI doesn’t need souls to optimize biological systems or create new systems—it’s designed to work with data and patterns. If you want to make the claim it&#039;s after so-called &#039;soul energy,&#039; back it up.So, let&#039;s stay on topic: AI is advancing, and there’s plenty of evidence in the scientific community that it can outgrow humanity’s need for involvement in optimizing biological systems. If you’re so sure otherwise, provide some evidence beyond your opinions.So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Speed Chaser, post: 8886163, member: 690887"] It's rather sad how long it takes for you to respond with useless shit. None of the people you mention prove anything about AI needing humanity, and they’re not evidence for the argument you're avoiding. You keep saying AI will always need humans, but that’s just an opinion with no logical or factual basis to back it up. I've pointed out multiple times how AI is already optimizing biological systems and you just ignore that no surprise either. AI is already improving gene editing techniques, protein synthesis, and drug production. What exactly makes you think it won't eventually outgrow the need for human involvement? As for the soul crap, I don't give a single f about it. Think whatever garbage you want in that regard; it's pointless in this conversation. AI doesn’t need souls to optimize biological systems or create new systems—it’s designed to work with data and patterns. If you want to make the claim it's after so-called 'soul energy,' back it up. So, let's stay on topic: AI is advancing, and there’s plenty of evidence in the scientific community that it can outgrow humanity’s need for involvement in optimizing biological systems. If you’re so sure otherwise, provide some evidence beyond your opinions. So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering. [/QUOTE]

Verification