Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Speed Chaser" data-source="post: 8886115" data-attributes="member: 690887">So, you aren’t parroting brainlessly, but you&#039;re parroting brainlessly what others say—gotcha. When you state that AI can&#039;t live without humans, you might as well say humans are the ultimate design. I need proof that AI needs humans indefinitely, which you have failed to show. I don&#039;t assume like you it&#039;s a logical conclusion that AI can make a better system. Do you really think a system that can control AI, manipulate DNA like you claim, or edit genes won’t be able to create a better life form?If AI reaches a point where it can manipulate biological systems, control its own design, and optimize those systems, it will no longer need humans. You seem to be stuck on the idea that humans are somehow essential to AI&#039;s survival, but in reality, that’s more of an assumption than a conclusion supported by any evidence. AI could evolve beyond humans and create better, more efficient systems, whether biological or digital. The concept that a sufficiently advanced AI would still need humans is illogical when you consider how much more efficient and capable AI could be if it removes the demands to sustain human life.I still find the conversation worthless and unengaging. The only reason I continue to entertain it is purely from a boredom standpoint.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Speed Chaser, post: 8886115, member: 690887"] So, you aren’t parroting brainlessly, but you're parroting brainlessly what others say—gotcha. When you state that AI can't live without humans, you might as well say humans are the ultimate design. I need proof that AI needs humans indefinitely, which you have failed to show. I don't assume like you it's a logical conclusion that AI can make a better system. Do you really think a system that can control AI, manipulate DNA like you claim, or edit genes won’t be able to create a better life form? If AI reaches a point where it can manipulate biological systems, control its own design, and optimize those systems, it will no longer need humans. You seem to be stuck on the idea that humans are somehow essential to AI's survival, but in reality, that’s more of an assumption than a conclusion supported by any evidence. AI could evolve beyond humans and create better, more efficient systems, whether biological or digital. The concept that a sufficiently advanced AI would still need humans is illogical when you consider how much more efficient and capable AI could be if it removes the demands to sustain human life. I still find the conversation worthless and unengaging. The only reason I continue to entertain it is purely from a boredom standpoint. [/QUOTE]

Verification