Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8885105" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>I guess if that's the standard normally used to judge tax cuts, then that's the standard Trump should be using when he makes the claim?</p><p></p><p>But maybe it's one of those "alternative facts" or "alternative definitions" situations. Maybe tax cuts are normally compared to GDP, but Trump is basing his claim on the huge cuts given to certain corporations or entities. He takes the one with the highest cut and considers that the "biggest in history".</p><p></p><p>Maybe it's the same with his "best economy in history". Perhaps he considers it the best because it was under HIM, even if it was not the best by any standard measures?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Point it out. What were the mistakes, sharing snips of your posts that you now deny having made?</p><p></p><p>It's not an allegation once it is proved, just like it is not a theory once it has been proved.</p><p>Your attempt to twist words to make yourself correct never works.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Admit Trump is lying when he says China, et al, will pay the import tariff that Trump places on good being imported to the US from those places.</p><p></p><p>When I buy it and it is shipped here to be received by me, I AM the "Actual Importer". CPB says it VERY clearly:</p><p><em>"<u>When you buy goods from foreign sources, <strong>you</strong> become the </u><strong><u>importer</u></strong>. And it is the <strong>importer</strong> - in this case, <strong>YOU</strong> - who is responsible for assuring that the goods comply with a variety of both state and federal government import regulations."</em></p><p><em><a href="https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/internet-purchases" target="_blank">https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/internet-purchases</a></em></p><p></p><p>And please don't waste time trying to spin things with the word "Actual" and some philosophical bullshit like "What is ACTUAL? Can you prove that you exist and are ACTUAL? What is reality?"</p><p>Those types of arguments just make you look the fool.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If one side does it and it is condoned and allowed, maybe even encouraged, by the supporters of that side, then it is fair game for all.</p><p>Don't be a hypocrite and say that what you do is OK, but no one else should be able to do it.</p><p>GTFOOH with that <em>"Rules for thee, but not for me" </em>bullshit.</p><p></p><p>Interesting how you always say facts are hatred when they fly in the face of your narrative.</p><p>I suppose if you jumped off a roof with the belief that gravity is false, you'd consider it "hatred" by the concrete when your leg snapped and it turned out the existence of gravity is a FACT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8885105, member: 683408"] I guess if that's the standard normally used to judge tax cuts, then that's the standard Trump should be using when he makes the claim? But maybe it's one of those "alternative facts" or "alternative definitions" situations. Maybe tax cuts are normally compared to GDP, but Trump is basing his claim on the huge cuts given to certain corporations or entities. He takes the one with the highest cut and considers that the "biggest in history". Maybe it's the same with his "best economy in history". Perhaps he considers it the best because it was under HIM, even if it was not the best by any standard measures? Point it out. What were the mistakes, sharing snips of your posts that you now deny having made? It's not an allegation once it is proved, just like it is not a theory once it has been proved. Your attempt to twist words to make yourself correct never works. Admit Trump is lying when he says China, et al, will pay the import tariff that Trump places on good being imported to the US from those places. When I buy it and it is shipped here to be received by me, I AM the "Actual Importer". CPB says it VERY clearly: [I]"[U]When you buy goods from foreign sources, [B]you[/B] become the [/U][B][U]importer[/U][/B]. And it is the [B]importer[/B] - in this case, [B]YOU[/B] - who is responsible for assuring that the goods comply with a variety of both state and federal government import regulations." [URL]https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/internet-purchases[/URL][/I] And please don't waste time trying to spin things with the word "Actual" and some philosophical bullshit like "What is ACTUAL? Can you prove that you exist and are ACTUAL? What is reality?" Those types of arguments just make you look the fool. If one side does it and it is condoned and allowed, maybe even encouraged, by the supporters of that side, then it is fair game for all. Don't be a hypocrite and say that what you do is OK, but no one else should be able to do it. GTFOOH with that [I]"Rules for thee, but not for me" [/I]bullshit. Interesting how you always say facts are hatred when they fly in the face of your narrative. I suppose if you jumped off a roof with the belief that gravity is false, you'd consider it "hatred" by the concrete when your leg snapped and it turned out the existence of gravity is a FACT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list