Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8885101" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Like I said, you will support your false claim to the death, no matter how much proof is provided that you are wrong. The entire medical industry suports the fact that bones have nerves in them, but YOU know it is not true.</p><p></p><p>Never claimed it? Are you sure about that? Your memory of your own actions must be pretty poor.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]61734[/ATTACH]</p><p><em>"In college anatomy was a major part of the biology I studied."</em></p><p><em>[ATTACH=full]61735[/ATTACH]</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, they can be verified as having been said. An allegation is not something that is proved, just like a proved fact is not a "theory", like your claim that nerves in hard bone is just a "theory.</p><p></p><p>You never WOULD admit he is lying about it. You won't even admit what an import tariff really IS, lest it show that he is lying when he claims China, et al, will pay the tariff.</p><p></p><p>For like the 5th time: Anyone who purchases and receives an item directly from a supplier in another country IS the importer. Taken directly form the CBP website: <em>"When you buy goods from foreign sources, <strong>you</strong> become the <strong>importer</strong>. And it is the <strong>importer</strong> - in this case, <strong>YOU</strong> - who is responsible for assuring that the goods comply with a variety of both state and federal government import regulations."</em></p><p><em>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/internet-purchases[/URL]</em></p><p></p><p>That means I'M the one who pays that tariff on that bike. And when Trump tacks on a 25% addition, that means I'M paying 25% more. And if I decided to Sell, I'M not absorbing that additional expense.</p><p></p><p>Much like WalMart, Autozone, and any other company whose products will be affected. They have already said they are passing on the costs.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Except you have it in reverse. Trump already did it, but now you right-wingers are upset that Biden did it.</p><p>So it's "Why do they get to have ice cream, now the WE have had some? Why aren't we special, and get to prevent others from having any?"</p><p>Talk about entitled and thinking you should get something, but withhold it from others.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I would say that Trump allowing the Taliban to become stronger than they had been in a decade, and not getting the troops out by the time he promised, is what got them killed.</p><p>If he had kept his word, there would have been no soldiers there and no soldiers to get killed.</p><p></p><p>Trump failed to keep his word, and it cost lives.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Negligible doesn't mean nonexistent. Using that to support your argument is a fail.</p><p>But can you tell me the relevance of your question? What does it have to do with giving government the authority to tell a person what they can do to their own body?</p><p></p><p>Wasn't someone just screaming about government involvement/interference when I suggested limiting the income/assets of big business owners? So we can't limit the accumulation of insane wealth on the backs of the US citizen, but it's OK to mandate what a woman does with her own uterus?</p><p>That's an interesting dichotomy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8885101, member: 683408"] Like I said, you will support your false claim to the death, no matter how much proof is provided that you are wrong. The entire medical industry suports the fact that bones have nerves in them, but YOU know it is not true. Never claimed it? Are you sure about that? Your memory of your own actions must be pretty poor. [ATTACH type="full" width="760px" alt="1733505539156.png"]61734[/ATTACH] [I]"In college anatomy was a major part of the biology I studied." [ATTACH type="full" width="757px" alt="1733506100940.png"]61735[/ATTACH][/I] No, they can be verified as having been said. An allegation is not something that is proved, just like a proved fact is not a "theory", like your claim that nerves in hard bone is just a "theory. You never WOULD admit he is lying about it. You won't even admit what an import tariff really IS, lest it show that he is lying when he claims China, et al, will pay the tariff. For like the 5th time: Anyone who purchases and receives an item directly from a supplier in another country IS the importer. Taken directly form the CBP website: [I]"When you buy goods from foreign sources, [B]you[/B] become the [B]importer[/B]. And it is the [B]importer[/B] - in this case, [B]YOU[/B] - who is responsible for assuring that the goods comply with a variety of both state and federal government import regulations." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/internet-purchases[/URL][/I] That means I'M the one who pays that tariff on that bike. And when Trump tacks on a 25% addition, that means I'M paying 25% more. And if I decided to Sell, I'M not absorbing that additional expense. Much like WalMart, Autozone, and any other company whose products will be affected. They have already said they are passing on the costs. Except you have it in reverse. Trump already did it, but now you right-wingers are upset that Biden did it. So it's "Why do they get to have ice cream, now the WE have had some? Why aren't we special, and get to prevent others from having any?" Talk about entitled and thinking you should get something, but withhold it from others. I would say that Trump allowing the Taliban to become stronger than they had been in a decade, and not getting the troops out by the time he promised, is what got them killed. If he had kept his word, there would have been no soldiers there and no soldiers to get killed. Trump failed to keep his word, and it cost lives. Negligible doesn't mean nonexistent. Using that to support your argument is a fail. But can you tell me the relevance of your question? What does it have to do with giving government the authority to tell a person what they can do to their own body? Wasn't someone just screaming about government involvement/interference when I suggested limiting the income/assets of big business owners? So we can't limit the accumulation of insane wealth on the backs of the US citizen, but it's OK to mandate what a woman does with her own uterus? That's an interesting dichotomy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
