Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8885003" data-attributes="member: 673702">The certainly found the most biased place for pool of biased jurors.&nbsp; They had to pass a new law just to get Trump.&nbsp; I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;d be singing a different tune if such tactics were used to take down somebody on the left.&nbsp; If you can&#039;t see the obvious flaws in EJC as a person and this case, I can only assume you&#039;re unable/unwilling to set aside your bias.&nbsp; Do you think the law should have treated Hunter so harshly?&nbsp; [URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://19thnews.org/2023/05/e-jean-carroll-trump-new-law-justice-assault-survivors/[/URL]339 residential mortgage cases in 2016.&nbsp; You would think it would be easier to find this data, but this what I found in a quick search.&nbsp; Data indicates that .75% of loan apps contain fraud, I don&#039;t know how many millions of apps are filed per year, but it looks like a really really low priority if you&#039;re not Trump.&nbsp; [URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Mortgage_Fraud_FY16.pdf[/URL]Trump didn&#039;t brag that he committed fraud.&nbsp; What he did is tell the American people that the system is rigged and he knows because he uses it to his advantage.&nbsp; Either you can acknowledge that in both Hunter&#039;s case and Trump&#039;s case, there never would have been cases if it weren&#039;t for who they are or you can remain in delulu land and keep trying to justify the Trump cases.&nbsp; It&#039;s that inability of the left to look back and acknowledge their mistakes that is pushing their own (former) advocates away and it makes the left completely foolish.&nbsp; If it&#039;s beyond you to admit that the Trump cases would never have been brought if he weren&#039;t a hated political figure.&nbsp; &quot;They&quot; certainly never invented any new laws to open Clinton up to defamation lawsuits for stuff that may or may not have happened decades ago.&nbsp; And trying to convince anybody with more than 2 brain cells to rub together that Trump is out there raping women when he trades in his model wife every couple of decades and is banging **** stars on the side is a pretty tough sell.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8885003, member: 673702"] The certainly found the most biased place for pool of biased jurors. They had to pass a new law just to get Trump. I'm pretty sure you'd be singing a different tune if such tactics were used to take down somebody on the left. If you can't see the obvious flaws in EJC as a person and this case, I can only assume you're unable/unwilling to set aside your bias. Do you think the law should have treated Hunter so harshly? [URL unfurl="true"]https://19thnews.org/2023/05/e-jean-carroll-trump-new-law-justice-assault-survivors/[/URL] 339 residential mortgage cases in 2016. You would think it would be easier to find this data, but this what I found in a quick search. Data indicates that .75% of loan apps contain fraud, I don't know how many millions of apps are filed per year, but it looks like a really really low priority if you're not Trump. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Mortgage_Fraud_FY16.pdf[/URL] Trump didn't brag that he committed fraud. What he did is tell the American people that the system is rigged and he knows because he uses it to his advantage. Either you can acknowledge that in both Hunter's case and Trump's case, there never would have been cases if it weren't for who they are or you can remain in delulu land and keep trying to justify the Trump cases. It's that inability of the left to look back and acknowledge their mistakes that is pushing their own (former) advocates away and it makes the left completely foolish. If it's beyond you to admit that the Trump cases would never have been brought if he weren't a hated political figure. "They" certainly never invented any new laws to open Clinton up to defamation lawsuits for stuff that may or may not have happened decades ago. And trying to convince anybody with more than 2 brain cells to rub together that Trump is out there raping women when he trades in his model wife every couple of decades and is banging **** stars on the side is a pretty tough sell. [/QUOTE]

Verification