Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8884873" data-attributes="member: 673702"><p>I don't think they should "hold the line." The Dems didn't "hold the line" when Trump was on his way out. Futhermore, I don't like the idea of either side stacking the court. Case in point, the stacked USSC overturned Roe v Wade, which was un-necessary and judicial over reach. They could have simply found Jackson v Hobbs was consistent with what the court laid out in Roe v Wade and leave 2 & 3rd trimester abortions to the States.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8884873, member: 673702"] I don't think they should "hold the line." The Dems didn't "hold the line" when Trump was on his way out. Futhermore, I don't like the idea of either side stacking the court. Case in point, the stacked USSC overturned Roe v Wade, which was un-necessary and judicial over reach. They could have simply found Jackson v Hobbs was consistent with what the court laid out in Roe v Wade and leave 2 & 3rd trimester abortions to the States. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list