Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8884824" data-attributes="member: 683408">Hydroponic tomato. Mexico. Pretty much flavorless.If we can do it better, why aren&#039;t we?[ATTACH=full]61685[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]61686[/ATTACH]Empty claims are not proof.Even Trump himself couldn&#039;t provide a shred of proof under a court order.You want me to name a thing Kamala did that makes me upset? OK: She went too easy on Trump int he debate. She should have ripped him to shreds like a piranha, using everything bad about him AGAINST him.Every tome he lied, she should have just shouted &quot;liar&quot; over his voice, the way he felt a need to talk over her.She shoukd have campaigned 3x as hard as she did.Good?OK, now get off your chest what you want to say you disliked that she did.WOW, you perform searched for a Republican, but not a Dmeocrat? What a tool!Here&#039;s how it goes, old-timer: If you want to live in a glass house, don&#039;t be a fool and throw stones.If you&#039;re gonna ***** about a judge donating TO the Democrat party, be REALLY ******* sure that&nbsp; other judges aren&#039;t getting donations FROM the Republican party.Don&#039;t be a hypocrite.&quot;Pure accusations&quot;? You&#039;re joking, right? Put down the KoolAid for two seconds, and watch this:[MEDIA=youtube]w41ZcNl-aCs[/MEDIA][ATTACH=full]61687[/ATTACH]If ytou think a judge shouldn&#039;t donate to a party, then you think a judge shouldn&#039;t support a party. Voting for a member in a party is supporting a party.So if judges shouldn&#039;t support a party, they shouldn&#039;t vote.But you&#039;re comfortable with judges getting donations FROM a party. Right?PACKING the court is adding judges to tilt the total in one&#039;s favor.Stacking the court is making it partisan in one&#039;s favor so that the majority will rule as you want them to. Roe v wade was an example of a stacked court giving a decision the minority has wanted for years.Two VERY different concepts.Ahhhh, some honesty, &quot;No more puppet libs&quot;. Instead we get &quot;puppet conservatives&quot;.Which is good and fair in order to get majority rulings in SCOTUS, but &quot;puppet libs&quot; getting majority rulings in SCOTUS are bad and unfair.Right?Be careful, your hypocrisy is showing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8884824, member: 683408"] Hydroponic tomato. Mexico. Pretty much flavorless. If we can do it better, why aren't we? [ATTACH type="full" width="237px" alt="IMG_5023.jpeg"]61685[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" width="220px" alt="IMG_5021.jpeg"]61686[/ATTACH] Empty claims are not proof. Even Trump himself couldn't provide a shred of proof under a court order. You want me to name a thing Kamala did that makes me upset? OK: She went too easy on Trump int he debate. She should have ripped him to shreds like a piranha, using everything bad about him AGAINST him. Every tome he lied, she should have just shouted "liar" over his voice, the way he felt a need to talk over her. She shoukd have campaigned 3x as hard as she did. Good? OK, now get off your chest what you want to say you disliked that she did. WOW, you perform searched for a Republican, but not a Dmeocrat? What a tool! Here's how it goes, old-timer: If you want to live in a glass house, don't be a fool and throw stones. If you're gonna ***** about a judge donating TO the Democrat party, be REALLY ******* sure that other judges aren't getting donations FROM the Republican party. Don't be a hypocrite. [I]"Pure accusations"[/I]? You're joking, right? Put down the KoolAid for two seconds, and watch this: [MEDIA=youtube]w41ZcNl-aCs[/MEDIA] [ATTACH type="full" width="499px" alt="1733272200648.png"]61687[/ATTACH] If ytou think a judge shouldn't donate to a party, then you think a judge shouldn't support a party. Voting for a member in a party is supporting a party. So if judges shouldn't support a party, they shouldn't vote. But you're comfortable with judges getting donations FROM a party. Right? PACKING the court is adding judges to tilt the total in one's favor. Stacking the court is making it partisan in one's favor so that the majority will rule as you want them to. Roe v wade was an example of a stacked court giving a decision the minority has wanted for years. Two VERY different concepts. Ahhhh, some honesty, "No more puppet libs". Instead we get "puppet conservatives". Which is good and fair in order to get majority rulings in SCOTUS, but "puppet libs" getting majority rulings in SCOTUS are bad and unfair. Right? Be careful, your hypocrisy is showing. [/QUOTE]

Verification