Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8884815" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>Except we have 42 MILLION people making less than a living wage.</p><p>That means 42 MILLION people that you think should move up within a year or two of entering the workforce.</p><p></p><p>Can you demonstrate the availability of 42 MILLION jobs on any given day for these people to move into?</p><p>Even if we assume only 25% "turnover" per year, that's 10 MILLION higher-paid openings for these workers to move into, as they are too old for a job with pay that they can't even live on.</p><p></p><p>You are conflating minimum wage with living wage.</p><p>A living wage is determined by what a full-time worker would have to earn to live in a given area without going into debt just to pay their daily bills.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll assume Biden funded it?</p><p></p><p>Ohhh, the CONVICTION was rigged. So none of the evidence was legitimate, Trump never overestimated the value of his properties, the properties were all worth what he claimed, he paid the taxes based on the claimed values, the jury was made up of all anti-Trumpers (even though they were picked by Trump's attorneys)?</p><p></p><p>Just one big scam, yet no one has shown the proof of this to the courts and had the decision overturned?</p><p>Sounds like the whole "stolen election" story. Claims, but no proof.</p><p></p><p>Sure. Which ones would you like me to point out?</p><p>Pick the most egregious.</p><p></p><p>THOUSANDS? Holy crap! I guess you forgot about Judge Thomas's many years of trips paid for by a GOP donor, that he "forgot" to declare? I guess you forgot about Ginny Thomas's ties to First Liberty Institute and the failure of her and Clarence to keep their business dealings separated? I guess you forgot about the Wisconsin judges who RECEIVED upwards of $150,000 in donations FROM the GOP?</p><p>You're upset becaus a judge donates TO a party, but not when a judge gets money FROM a party?</p><p></p><p>Are you suggesting that judges should not be allowed to vote or have a poiltical leaning?</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Assigned more republicans". Do you not understand this is in order to have a right-leaning court? As in "stacking", so that it's not a bipartisan court?</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]61684[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Hold the line for WHAT? For Trump to appoint left-leaning judges whenever there is an opening?</p><p>Do you think that is the case, or "hold the line" so that any opening can be filled by a right-leaning appointment?</p><p>I can only hope you're pretending to be naive, and are not really that clueless.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No no, that's all bullshit. H</p><p>istory has been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump out to be a liar.</p><p>The Annunaki traveled through time in pyramids and changed all the records. They were paid by Soros with bitcoin through his deep state dark web contacts.</p><p>They bought gold with the bitcoin and brought it back with them and buried it in order to enslave humans and make them mine for the gold.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8884815, member: 683408"] Except we have 42 MILLION people making less than a living wage. That means 42 MILLION people that you think should move up within a year or two of entering the workforce. Can you demonstrate the availability of 42 MILLION jobs on any given day for these people to move into? Even if we assume only 25% "turnover" per year, that's 10 MILLION higher-paid openings for these workers to move into, as they are too old for a job with pay that they can't even live on. You are conflating minimum wage with living wage. A living wage is determined by what a full-time worker would have to earn to live in a given area without going into debt just to pay their daily bills. I'll assume Biden funded it? Ohhh, the CONVICTION was rigged. So none of the evidence was legitimate, Trump never overestimated the value of his properties, the properties were all worth what he claimed, he paid the taxes based on the claimed values, the jury was made up of all anti-Trumpers (even though they were picked by Trump's attorneys)? Just one big scam, yet no one has shown the proof of this to the courts and had the decision overturned? Sounds like the whole "stolen election" story. Claims, but no proof. Sure. Which ones would you like me to point out? Pick the most egregious. THOUSANDS? Holy crap! I guess you forgot about Judge Thomas's many years of trips paid for by a GOP donor, that he "forgot" to declare? I guess you forgot about Ginny Thomas's ties to First Liberty Institute and the failure of her and Clarence to keep their business dealings separated? I guess you forgot about the Wisconsin judges who RECEIVED upwards of $150,000 in donations FROM the GOP? You're upset becaus a judge donates TO a party, but not when a judge gets money FROM a party? Are you suggesting that judges should not be allowed to vote or have a poiltical leaning? "Assigned more republicans". Do you not understand this is in order to have a right-leaning court? As in "stacking", so that it's not a bipartisan court? [ATTACH type="full" width="409px" alt="1733269197922.png"]61684[/ATTACH] Hold the line for WHAT? For Trump to appoint left-leaning judges whenever there is an opening? Do you think that is the case, or "hold the line" so that any opening can be filled by a right-leaning appointment? I can only hope you're pretending to be naive, and are not really that clueless. No no, that's all bullshit. H istory has been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump out to be a liar. The Annunaki traveled through time in pyramids and changed all the records. They were paid by Soros with bitcoin through his deep state dark web contacts. They bought gold with the bitcoin and brought it back with them and buried it in order to enslave humans and make them mine for the gold. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
