Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8884374" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>No, it's actually from a post that Spokey made.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]61613[/ATTACH]</p><p>He failed to show an example of ANY economist saying massive debt is a good thing, and he very clearly said that just because they have degrees, they are not always right. </p><p>And that was directly referencing the universal consensus of economists regarding tariffs, not whether they prefer vanilla over chocolate.</p><p>Obviously, he knows better than they do.</p><p>But is unable to answer the question of who pays a tariff...</p><p></p><p>And we aren't China. </p><p>The tariffs under Trump failed to do what he intended.</p><p>We have proof of that.</p><p></p><p>He intends to do the same thing he did in 2018, which failed that time.</p><p>Why is there an assumption that the results of doing the same thing in 2025 will be different?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8884374, member: 683408"] No, it's actually from a post that Spokey made. [ATTACH type="full"]61613[/ATTACH] He failed to show an example of ANY economist saying massive debt is a good thing, and he very clearly said that just because they have degrees, they are not always right. And that was directly referencing the universal consensus of economists regarding tariffs, not whether they prefer vanilla over chocolate. Obviously, he knows better than they do. But is unable to answer the question of who pays a tariff... And we aren't China. The tariffs under Trump failed to do what he intended. We have proof of that. He intends to do the same thing he did in 2018, which failed that time. Why is there an assumption that the results of doing the same thing in 2025 will be different? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
