Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8883802" data-attributes="member: 683408">Ahhh, we&#039;re back to your &quot;alternative definitions&quot;.So we couldn&#039;t get by without importing a MINIMUM of 7.9 million barrels of oil PER DAY, but we were &quot;independent&quot;.Cool. In that case, gas has only been $1.50 a gallon under Biden for the past four years. Why are you struggling so hard?So tell me: What is your full definition of &quot;energy independence&quot;?You should vote for **** seed. It&#039;d be more in line with the &quot;conservative&quot; party choices.It&#039;s because you don&#039;t know a thing about the bullshit you simply hear and repeat.You think you&#039;re in an echo chamber and will just get applauded for every bullshit claim you repeat. When you get challenged, you have no idea what to say, or even the skills to research for an appropriate answer.The few times you actually tried, the proofs you provided were contrary to your claims.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8883802, member: 683408"] Ahhh, we're back to your "alternative definitions". So we couldn't get by without importing a MINIMUM of 7.9 million barrels of oil PER DAY, but we were "independent". Cool. In that case, gas has only been $1.50 a gallon under Biden for the past four years. Why are you struggling so hard? So tell me: What is your full definition of "energy independence"? You should vote for **** seed. It'd be more in line with the "conservative" party choices. It's because you don't know a thing about the bullshit you simply hear and repeat. You think you're in an echo chamber and will just get applauded for every bullshit claim you repeat. When you get challenged, you have no idea what to say, or even the skills to research for an appropriate answer. The few times you actually tried, the proofs you provided were contrary to your claims. [/QUOTE]

Verification