Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8873435" data-attributes="member: 683408">So, you want to argue beliefs that are not based on fact?What exactly is the point or the benefit? Argue all day long that you believe a god exists. Where can the argument ever go without proof?That&#039;s not people say. People quote the words that HE said. here they are: &quot;You know I&#039;m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It&#039;s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don&#039;t even wait. And when you&#039;re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab &#039;em by the *****. You can do anything.&quot;Seems like you want to defend him so bad, you will change the story to make him innocent.He said the words above. There is no denying it.Did he actually do it? Well, if he is declaring that they let him do anything, then a crotch grab is possible, no? he&#039;d have to be speaking from experience to say such a thing, no?.But of course, he could have been lying about women letting him do anything. So then when he says &quot;I just start kissing them&quot;, he&#039;s admitting to making unasked-for physical contact with women.No one said he did. They quoted the sh*t out of him saying what he did and expressing personal knowledge of what COULD be done by HIM.So, if he never did it, he was lying in saying they&#039;d let him do it, b/c he didn&#039;t really know.But the big picture is arguing beliefs versus facts.What benefit do you get arguing beliefs that you have no way of proving?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8873435, member: 683408"] So, you want to argue beliefs that are not based on fact? What exactly is the point or the benefit? Argue all day long that you believe a god exists. Where can the argument ever go without proof? That's not people say. People quote the words that HE said. here they are: [I]"You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the *****. You can do anything."[/I] Seems like you want to defend him so bad, you will change the story to make him innocent. He said the words above. There is no denying it. Did he actually do it? Well, if he is declaring that they let him do anything, then a crotch grab is possible, no? he'd have to be speaking from experience to say such a thing, no? . But of course, he could have been lying about women letting him do anything. So then when he says "I just start kissing them", he's admitting to making unasked-for physical contact with women. No one said he did. They quoted the sh*t out of him saying what he did and expressing personal knowledge of what COULD be done by HIM. So, if he never did it, he was lying in saying they'd let him do it, b/c he didn't really know. But the big picture is arguing beliefs versus facts. What benefit do you get arguing beliefs that you have no way of proving? [/QUOTE]

Verification