Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8873422" data-attributes="member: 683408">If your goal is to look like an idiot, you are succeeding.You can&#039;t even prove that ONE of the lies I posted is actually a truth. You actually admitted the &quot;571 mile&quot; one was a lie, which means you already can&#039;t prove that Trump is not a liar.Do you want to prove 30,000 times that he IS a liar? Do the first 30 I have posted, then I will post another 30. And another 30.Try to cross the starting line before you want a trophy for getting to the finish.Like Thxone, you completely missed the point I was making.I&#039;ll help you out. The example was all about arguing beliefs vs. arguing factsI believe Trump ***** at least one woman. My belief doesn&#039;t mean sh*t here if I have no proof. It belongs in the &quot;Things I Believe Thread&quot;, not in an argument of facts.I KNOW Trump has been accused of **** multiple times. I can provide proof of the accusations, so it is something I can state in THIS thread, in an argument of factual info.See the difference?It makes no sense to argue beliefs that cannot be proved. It&#039;s a fool&#039;s folly, and I don&#039;t understand why people insist on doing it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8873422, member: 683408"] If your goal is to look like an idiot, you are succeeding. You can't even prove that ONE of the lies I posted is actually a truth. You actually admitted the "571 mile" one was a lie, which means you already can't prove that Trump is not a liar. Do you want to prove 30,000 times that he IS a liar? Do the first 30 I have posted, then I will post another 30. And another 30. Try to cross the starting line before you want a trophy for getting to the finish. Like Thxone, you completely missed the point I was making. I'll help you out. The example was all about arguing beliefs vs. arguing facts I believe Trump ***** at least one woman. My belief doesn't mean sh*t here if I have no proof. It belongs in the "Things I Believe Thread", not in an argument of facts. I KNOW Trump has been accused of **** multiple times. I can provide proof of the accusations, so it is something I can state in THIS thread, in an argument of factual info. See the difference? It makes no sense to argue beliefs that cannot be proved. It's a fool's folly, and I don't understand why people insist on doing it. [/QUOTE]

Verification