Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8873291" data-attributes="member: 683408">Except for if he is POTUS, he can order the Justice Dept to drop the federal case against him, and the JD in the past has said a case against a sitting POTUS would be unconstitutional b/c it would interfere with him performing his duties. That would be an &quot;additional immunity&quot; from prosecution that he wouldn&#039;t have as former POTUS/Then there&#039;s the fact that a criminal conviction before an election would absolutely affect how the vote goes. Why should he be allowed to postpone a CRIMINAL trial (or several) just because the outcome might hurt his popularity with the voters?Not to mention that if he gets elected, there could be a push to have Willis herself impeached because of Senate Bill 92.So yeah, postponing the criminal trials could definitely be an unfair advantage to him.&quot;Bully them into something&quot;? You mean like doing what they are SUPPOSED to do if they have enough evidence to impeach?&quot;Bully&quot; is an interesting term to describe a Democrat senator challenging Republicans to actually do what they have been threatening to do for 15 months. Threatening to impeach for 15 months when they admit today that they do not have the evidence to do so. A basic declaration of guilt without evidence, thus without even knowing what someone could be guilty of. A lack of corpus delicti, as it were.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8873291, member: 683408"] Except for if he is POTUS, he can order the Justice Dept to drop the federal case against him, [B]and [/B]the JD in the past has said a case against a sitting POTUS would be unconstitutional b/c it would interfere with him performing his duties. That would be an "additional immunity" from prosecution that he wouldn't have as former POTUS/ Then there's the fact that a criminal conviction before an election would absolutely affect how the vote goes. Why should he be allowed to postpone a CRIMINAL trial (or several) just because the outcome might hurt his popularity with the voters? Not to mention that if he gets elected, there could be a push to have Willis herself impeached because of Senate Bill 92. So yeah, postponing the criminal trials could definitely be an unfair advantage to him. "Bully them into something"? You mean like doing what they are SUPPOSED to do if they have enough evidence to impeach? "Bully" is an interesting term to describe a Democrat senator challenging Republicans to actually do what they have been threatening to do for 15 months. Threatening to impeach for 15 months when they admit today that they do not have the evidence to do so. A basic declaration of guilt without evidence, thus without even knowing what someone could be guilty of. A lack of corpus delicti, as it were. [/QUOTE]

Verification