Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8873191" data-attributes="member: 683408">Sorry, I&#039;m not accepting what you say that he says as proof of anything.I wouldn&#039;t tell you that Trump is a liar and use a claim made by Danny Duncan as my proof. I&#039;ll tell you Trump is a liar and use direct evidence as my proof. That&#039;s how I roll.When Trump falsely claims a statistic and that statistic can be verified at the source, I&#039;ll say so.For example, when Trump claims he hilt &quot;517 miles&quot; of wall, but a GAO report gives exact detail on how much wall was built, I accept the GAO report, and know Trump is lying.When Trump claims there were 10,000 votes &quot;illegally counted&quot; in Pennsylvania, but the State Department recorded indicate this is false, I know Trump is lying.When Trump claims &quot;greatest economy in the history of the world&quot; but every stat available from the govt and DOZENS of other data sources show contrary numbers, I know Trump is lying.When Trump claims 500,000 illegals arrested, but border control agencies report 100,000 arrests, I know Trump is lying.When Trump claims &quot;hundreds of thousands&quot; of people at his rally, but photographic evidence shows about 8,000 people, I know he is lying.Do you see a pattern here?No tangents. No ad hominem. No obfuscation. No tapdancing. No spin. No backpedaling.I&#039;m simply presenting the lie and can back up the accusations with proof that anyone here can view.If you want to argue against me by presenting your beliefs, opinions, feelings, hearsay, etc, then don&#039;t bother typing. None of that stuff adds any value to the discussion.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8873191, member: 683408"] Sorry, I'm not accepting what you say that he says as proof of anything. I wouldn't tell you that Trump is a liar and use a claim made by Danny Duncan as my proof. I'll tell you Trump is a liar and use direct evidence as my proof. That's how I roll. When Trump falsely claims a statistic and that statistic can be verified at the source, I'll say so. For example, when Trump claims he hilt "517 miles" of wall, but a GAO report gives exact detail on how much wall was built, I accept the GAO report, and know Trump is lying. When Trump claims there were 10,000 votes "illegally counted" in Pennsylvania, but the State Department recorded indicate this is false, I know Trump is lying. When Trump claims "greatest economy in the history of the world" but every stat available from the govt and DOZENS of other data sources show contrary numbers, I know Trump is lying. When Trump claims 500,000 illegals arrested, but border control agencies report 100,000 arrests, I know Trump is lying. When Trump claims "hundreds of thousands" of people at his rally, but photographic evidence shows about 8,000 people, I know he is lying. Do you see a pattern here? No tangents. No ad hominem. No obfuscation. No tapdancing. No spin. No backpedaling. I'm simply presenting the lie and can back up the accusations with proof that anyone here can view. If you want to argue against me by presenting your beliefs, opinions, feelings, hearsay, etc, then don't bother typing. None of that stuff adds any value to the discussion. [/QUOTE]

Verification