Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8872439" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>[ATTACH=full]57322[/ATTACH]</p><p>Hmmm, it seems you said you deemed it safe biologically. I see nothing about "except for the water and the dirt" in there.</p><p>What did you do, check the toilet seats for ecoli?</p><p></p><p>Oh? Pretty sure this is what YOU said. Or was it the frog in your pocket doing the typing?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]57323[/ATTACH]</p><p>"deemed safe biologically" except for the land and the water, it seems.</p><p>But who cares about water for safety testing on a base where people live and train?</p><p><em>"National Guard officials began looking into the historic use of PFAS-containing foam at Camp Ripley in 2019, Kruse said. He said they identified eight areas within the camp where foam might have been stored or used in training.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Testing revealed that one of the sites had PFAS-contaminated soil. Kruse said. Seven had groundwater with PFAS levels higher than a level thought to be safe for vulnerable populations, including infants."</em></p><p></p><p>Here's the information, in a nutshell. You congratulated yourself on deeming Camp Ripley "safe biologically", and then they found out it was unsafe biologically.</p><p>Good work.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]57324[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p><em>"National Guard officials began looking into the historic use of PFAS-containing foam at Camp Ripley in 2019, Kruse said. He said they identified eight areas within the camp where foam might have been stored or used in training.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Testing revealed that one of the sites had PFAS-contaminated soil. Kruse said. Seven had groundwater with PFAS levels higher than a level thought to be safe for vulnerable populations, including infants."</em></p><p></p><p>Now go ahead and tell me what information I am lacking.</p><p>Don't give me that "top secret" bullsh*t you tried last time, or warn me that I shouldn't be looking at info about Ripley.</p><p>Just fess up and say you either f*cked up, or you're completely full of sh*t.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It IS kind of funny that I get a post limit, but a guy who tells a moderator to go f*ck himself, and another one who tells people to commit ******* are free to post as much as they want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8872439, member: 683408"] [ATTACH type="full" width="776px" alt="1710287929158.png"]57322[/ATTACH] Hmmm, it seems you said you deemed it safe biologically. I see nothing about "except for the water and the dirt" in there. What did you do, check the toilet seats for ecoli? Oh? Pretty sure this is what YOU said. Or was it the frog in your pocket doing the typing? [ATTACH type="full" width="724px" alt="1710288019527.png"]57323[/ATTACH] "deemed safe biologically" except for the land and the water, it seems. But who cares about water for safety testing on a base where people live and train? [I]"National Guard officials began looking into the historic use of PFAS-containing foam at Camp Ripley in 2019, Kruse said. He said they identified eight areas within the camp where foam might have been stored or used in training. Testing revealed that one of the sites had PFAS-contaminated soil. Kruse said. Seven had groundwater with PFAS levels higher than a level thought to be safe for vulnerable populations, including infants."[/I] Here's the information, in a nutshell. You congratulated yourself on deeming Camp Ripley "safe biologically", and then they found out it was unsafe biologically. Good work. [ATTACH type="full" width="720px" alt="1710288399016.png"]57324[/ATTACH] [I]"National Guard officials began looking into the historic use of PFAS-containing foam at Camp Ripley in 2019, Kruse said. He said they identified eight areas within the camp where foam might have been stored or used in training. Testing revealed that one of the sites had PFAS-contaminated soil. Kruse said. Seven had groundwater with PFAS levels higher than a level thought to be safe for vulnerable populations, including infants."[/I] Now go ahead and tell me what information I am lacking. Don't give me that "top secret" bullsh*t you tried last time, or warn me that I shouldn't be looking at info about Ripley. Just fess up and say you either f*cked up, or you're completely full of sh*t. It IS kind of funny that I get a post limit, but a guy who tells a moderator to go f*ck himself, and another one who tells people to commit ******* are free to post as much as they want. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list