Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8872181" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>You're off on another tangent that has no relevance to the questions. </p><p></p><p>Why is it so difficult for you, Spokey, et al to stick to the point being argued, and speak specifically to that point?</p><p></p><p>You might as well argue about the color shirt the final assembler was wearing as a reason to determine a gun an "assault rifle". </p><p></p><p>So help Spokey out, and explain how the Republicans had nothing to do with Roe v Wade being overturned. </p><p>Additionally, explain how denying a pregnant woman the right to an abortion is not in effect forcing her to procreate. </p><p></p><p>You basically just argued that almost no rights should exist, especially the right to bear arms. </p><p>Might want to retract that attempt. </p><p></p><p>I'm working with the definition of procreation YOU provided. </p><p>Do you now want to retract it and say it's an incorrect definition?</p><p></p><p>The definition of procreation you gave us can include the concept of conception, but does not have to. </p><p>Gestation and birth alone are procreation. </p><p>So by denying a pregnant woman the right to an abortion, she is being forced to gestate and give birth. </p><p>By the very definition of the word, she is being forced to procreate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8872181, member: 683408"] You're off on another tangent that has no relevance to the questions. Why is it so difficult for you, Spokey, et al to stick to the point being argued, and speak specifically to that point? You might as well argue about the color shirt the final assembler was wearing as a reason to determine a gun an "assault rifle". So help Spokey out, and explain how the Republicans had nothing to do with Roe v Wade being overturned. Additionally, explain how denying a pregnant woman the right to an abortion is not in effect forcing her to procreate. You basically just argued that almost no rights should exist, especially the right to bear arms. Might want to retract that attempt. I'm working with the definition of procreation YOU provided. Do you now want to retract it and say it's an incorrect definition? The definition of procreation you gave us can include the concept of conception, but does not have to. Gestation and birth alone are procreation. So by denying a pregnant woman the right to an abortion, she is being forced to gestate and give birth. By the very definition of the word, she is being forced to procreate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list