Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Crystal Vs CDT Vs Mb Quart Component sets, help!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denim" data-source="post: 294371" data-attributes="member: 545441"><p><strong>ok for my personal take on them, the MB quarts are a little too harsh on the high highs, and the CDTs dont have enough mid-bass, but I really like the crystals for the money, </strong></p><p></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p></p><p><strong>for the tweeters, the titanium are for sharper more accurate high frequencies, but at elevated volumes they can become piercing to the human ear if they are not defeated somewhat or equalized correctly, but for the silk dome tweeter it is a little warmer of a sound and in some cases a little better for daily driving, not as sharp as the titanium but they have a smoother rool off between the high tones, from what I have see the titanuims are more suspetable to phasing problems if not directed at the optimum point of listening (driver's ear) hope that helps some</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denim, post: 294371, member: 545441"] [B]ok for my personal take on them, the MB quarts are a little too harsh on the high highs, and the CDTs dont have enough mid-bass, but I really like the crystals for the money, [/B] [B] [/B] [B] [/B] [B]for the tweeters, the titanium are for sharper more accurate high frequencies, but at elevated volumes they can become piercing to the human ear if they are not defeated somewhat or equalized correctly, but for the silk dome tweeter it is a little warmer of a sound and in some cases a little better for daily driving, not as sharp as the titanium but they have a smoother rool off between the high tones, from what I have see the titanuims are more suspetable to phasing problems if not directed at the optimum point of listening (driver's ear) hope that helps some[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Crystal Vs CDT Vs Mb Quart Component sets, help!!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list