Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="thefunkybunch" data-source="post: 2554967" data-attributes="member: 563903">i have been in the industry for some time, and had experience with most of what you listed... here&#039;s my .02the kenwoods ****.&nbsp; steer clear.the quarts sound o.k. but the tweets seem a bit on the harsh side, and it&#039;s not a real &#039;natural&#039; sound for lack of a better word.the polks i found to be very flat and lifeless sounding.&nbsp; they didn&#039;t have the &#039;snap&#039; that i personally prefer.of what you listed, i would either do the boston pro&#039;s or the jl audio ZR&#039;s, depending on what kind of music you listen to.&nbsp; if you listen to a lot of rap, and like lots of tweet, the pro&#039;s are right up your alley.&nbsp; they are still a great sounding speaker, but their tweets are a bit on the harsh side.&nbsp; in my jetta, i was debating on the pro&#039;s or the Z6&#039;s.&nbsp; i ended up going with the Z&#039;s for the following reasons...the tweets are WAAAAAAAAAAY smoother than the pro&#039;sthe midbass is quite a bit more pronouncedthey are a warmer, more natural sounding speaker.&nbsp;&nbsp; but for almost twice the money, they better be //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifi told you that to tell you this...the jl audio ZR&#039;s are right between the pro&#039;s and the Z&#039;s.&nbsp; they&#039;re way smoother than the pro&#039;s, and a more natural sound, but they lack the warm creamy sound that the Z&#039;s have.&nbsp; don&#039;t get me wrong, they are an incredible sounding set, and i&#039;d probably take those over everything else listed, but they just aren&#039;t quite up to the level of the Z&#039;s yet... i am excited to hear the new Z&#039;s though... will probably have to **** up and buy a set.just one man&#039;s opinion //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="thefunkybunch, post: 2554967, member: 563903"] i have been in the industry for some time, and had experience with most of what you listed... here's my .02 the kenwoods ****. steer clear. the quarts sound o.k. but the tweets seem a bit on the harsh side, and it's not a real 'natural' sound for lack of a better word. the polks i found to be very flat and lifeless sounding. they didn't have the 'snap' that i personally prefer. of what you listed, i would either do the boston pro's or the jl audio ZR's, depending on what kind of music you listen to. if you listen to a lot of rap, and like lots of tweet, the pro's are right up your alley. they are still a great sounding speaker, but their tweets are a bit on the harsh side. in my jetta, i was debating on the pro's or the Z6's. i ended up going with the Z's for the following reasons... the tweets are WAAAAAAAAAAY smoother than the pro's the midbass is quite a bit more pronounced they are a warmer, more natural sounding speaker. but for almost twice the money, they better be [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] i told you that to tell you this... the jl audio ZR's are right between the pro's and the Z's. they're way smoother than the pro's, and a more natural sound, but they lack the warm creamy sound that the Z's have. don't get me wrong, they are an incredible sounding set, and i'd probably take those over everything else listed, but they just aren't quite up to the level of the Z's yet... i am excited to hear the new Z's though... will probably have to **** up and buy a set. just one man's opinion [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification