Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Couple Questions on PR setups
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackout67" data-source="post: 8904084" data-attributes="member: 683415"><p>Maybe thats why I was having issues modeling in WINIsd. It only had the problem. with the PR and not any other alignments and a lot of their description is the typical car audio jargon but the way i saw it was it makes sense the FS would be low since there is no spider suspension to stiffen up the cone movement, just high roll foam on either side of the cone so it made sense in my mind atleast that it would be pretty compliant and have a low FS</p><p></p><p>Either way those the results speak for themselves and it seems to be pretty popular and people get good response out of them regardless of if the TS specs are off. They seem to get much better reviews than thr Dayton passive drivers I was looking at</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackout67, post: 8904084, member: 683415"] Maybe thats why I was having issues modeling in WINIsd. It only had the problem. with the PR and not any other alignments and a lot of their description is the typical car audio jargon but the way i saw it was it makes sense the FS would be low since there is no spider suspension to stiffen up the cone movement, just high roll foam on either side of the cone so it made sense in my mind atleast that it would be pretty compliant and have a low FS Either way those the results speak for themselves and it seems to be pretty popular and people get good response out of them regardless of if the TS specs are off. They seem to get much better reviews than thr Dayton passive drivers I was looking at [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Couple Questions on PR setups
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
