Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Converting to a new brand
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6944686" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>I find that testing to be questionable at best. All testing was done by ear. And by an ear whom offered no qualifications for his subjective opinions presented as facts. Also, he repeated multiple times the amps were set 'flat'. Uhm, no they weren't, they were level-matched for output (obviously not level matched at the frequency he claims was artificially boosted). If the amps were set 'flat', an EQ and RTA would have been involved. No mention of even attempting an anechoic environment, verifying the other equipment in his test setup by way of "all my buddies say it plays flat", and "Mom" was his most revealing judge. The entire thing smacks of a highschool science project. Lastly, even if his conclusions are accurate, its one model out of dozens and even hundreds that RF has offered over the years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6944686, member: 549629"] I find that testing to be questionable at best. All testing was done by ear. And by an ear whom offered no qualifications for his subjective opinions presented as facts. Also, he repeated multiple times the amps were set 'flat'. Uhm, no they weren't, they were level-matched for output (obviously not level matched at the frequency he claims was artificially boosted). If the amps were set 'flat', an EQ and RTA would have been involved. No mention of even attempting an anechoic environment, verifying the other equipment in his test setup by way of "all my buddies say it plays flat", and "Mom" was his most revealing judge. The entire thing smacks of a highschool science project. Lastly, even if his conclusions are accurate, its one model out of dozens and even hundreds that RF has offered over the years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Converting to a new brand
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list