Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
consipracy... overweight = spl lovers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lusso5" data-source="post: 315759" data-attributes="member: 549868"><p>LOL.</p><p></p><p>If you ask me 99.99 % of the members on this site are subwoofer crazy. Maybe you should take a body-fat composition poll along with a poll of how many sub-watts, or cubic inches of sub-driver, etc (I wouldn't know - I'm not sub-crazy). We could set up the data sets, classes, and distributions, and get the some real statistics. Since most probably dont know their body-fat comp, you should probably ask thin/medium/heavy build. With the way sub-drivers are performing today, total continuous sub-watts driven would probably be the most simple question to identify "sub-crazy" dont you think?</p><p></p><p>Depending on how you set up polls, some info could be skewed, so the most accurate way would be to start a thread asking for body composition (BC) and total continuous sub-watts driven (TCSwD). Then we could get exact wattage numbers. Your "fat" category would have to be "heavy".</p><p></p><p>e.g.</p><p></p><p>BC: Medium</p><p></p><p>TCSwD: 250</p><p></p><p>If we get a few to start of, it might actually get some response.....maybe not. You start the thread, I'll do any statistics you want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lusso5, post: 315759, member: 549868"] LOL. If you ask me 99.99 % of the members on this site are subwoofer crazy. Maybe you should take a body-fat composition poll along with a poll of how many sub-watts, or cubic inches of sub-driver, etc (I wouldn't know - I'm not sub-crazy). We could set up the data sets, classes, and distributions, and get the some real statistics. Since most probably dont know their body-fat comp, you should probably ask thin/medium/heavy build. With the way sub-drivers are performing today, total continuous sub-watts driven would probably be the most simple question to identify "sub-crazy" dont you think? Depending on how you set up polls, some info could be skewed, so the most accurate way would be to start a thread asking for body composition (BC) and total continuous sub-watts driven (TCSwD). Then we could get exact wattage numbers. Your "fat" category would have to be "heavy". e.g. BC: Medium TCSwD: 250 If we get a few to start of, it might actually get some response.....maybe not. You start the thread, I'll do any statistics you want. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
consipracy... overweight = spl lovers
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list