Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Component help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zako" data-source="post: 8051422" data-attributes="member: 629735"><p>In defense of Focal VBs, I think anyone who heard them had a good impression of them and they don't seem that expensive usually. The woofer is confirmed to have low THD and low resonance frequency at 67Hz. Here is a picture of frequency response on axis and off axis below. Looks pretty good 50 degrees off axis. Somewhat irregular above 5KHz, but that's easily fixed with equalizer. Are they better than JBL MS-62C? Hard to say. Probably no one has heard both. They're certainly quite different. The Focal woofer is made from processed paper and the tweeter has high resonance, so the woofer is expected to cover a much wide range of frequencies. Well made paper woofers can cope with this. The JBLs employ carbon woofer, which is a stiff material that does not always behave well above 2KHz, so the tweeters _have_ to play low. The problems with many speakers of this type is that tweeters often can't play this low without sounding harsh. However, according to reviews JBLs have pretty nice sounding tweeters.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.avtozvuk.com/az/2010/06/comp_graf/comp_gr_focal.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zako, post: 8051422, member: 629735"] In defense of Focal VBs, I think anyone who heard them had a good impression of them and they don't seem that expensive usually. The woofer is confirmed to have low THD and low resonance frequency at 67Hz. Here is a picture of frequency response on axis and off axis below. Looks pretty good 50 degrees off axis. Somewhat irregular above 5KHz, but that's easily fixed with equalizer. Are they better than JBL MS-62C? Hard to say. Probably no one has heard both. They're certainly quite different. The Focal woofer is made from processed paper and the tweeter has high resonance, so the woofer is expected to cover a much wide range of frequencies. Well made paper woofers can cope with this. The JBLs employ carbon woofer, which is a stiff material that does not always behave well above 2KHz, so the tweeters _have_ to play low. The problems with many speakers of this type is that tweeters often can't play this low without sounding harsh. However, according to reviews JBLs have pretty nice sounding tweeters. [IMG]http://www.avtozvuk.com/az/2010/06/comp_graf/comp_gr_focal.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Component help
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list