Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Colts win!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhoSayWho?" data-source="post: 2634439" data-attributes="member: 568804"><p>On one hand I can see where you guys are coming from on Manning not deserving the MVP. I thought before it was announced that it was going to be a bit of a stretch to give it to him.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, what one person deserved it more than he. I don't think you can say both running backs. That just seems to say that the running game, overall, was more important than the passing game overall. Is there a precedent for giving THE Most Valuable Player award to two players?</p><p></p><p>Also, do you really think that either of the RB's was more important than Manning? I think that if Manning had gone down with an injury on the first play the outcome would have been more likely to be different than if one of the RB's had gone down.</p><p></p><p>I think that it is a tough call. But there is no doubt that Manning had the advantage on that award going into the game. It was an uphill battle for everyone else on the Colts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhoSayWho?, post: 2634439, member: 568804"] On one hand I can see where you guys are coming from on Manning not deserving the MVP. I thought before it was announced that it was going to be a bit of a stretch to give it to him. On the other hand, what one person deserved it more than he. I don't think you can say both running backs. That just seems to say that the running game, overall, was more important than the passing game overall. Is there a precedent for giving THE Most Valuable Player award to two players? Also, do you really think that either of the RB's was more important than Manning? I think that if Manning had gone down with an injury on the first play the outcome would have been more likely to be different than if one of the RB's had gone down. I think that it is a tough call. But there is no doubt that Manning had the advantage on that award going into the game. It was an uphill battle for everyone else on the Colts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Colts win!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list