Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Class AB vs D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 5042694" data-attributes="member: 555320"><p>It goes as high as 1.5db //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif</p><p></p><p>Is it the worst amp ever? No.</p><p></p><p>Is it audible? Yes.</p><p></p><p>And it occurs over a relatively wide range of frequencies. The low frequency "hump" remains over 1db for nearly 3 octaves, the high frequency hump for nearly 2 octaves.</p><p></p><p>The point wasn't to claim the RF was a horrible amplifier. Certainly you could find significantly worse. Only that it's possible to find other amp topologies touted as "inferior" by some that would have "superior" frequency response performance and hence greater accuracy from a FR perspective.....partially nullifying their argument that "all class [insert A-H] sound better than class [insert A-H]".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 5042694, member: 555320"] It goes as high as 1.5db [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif[/IMG] Is it the worst amp ever? No. Is it audible? Yes. And it occurs over a relatively wide range of frequencies. The low frequency "hump" remains over 1db for nearly 3 octaves, the high frequency hump for nearly 2 octaves. The point wasn't to claim the RF was a horrible amplifier. Certainly you could find significantly worse. Only that it's possible to find other amp topologies touted as "inferior" by some that would have "superior" frequency response performance and hence greater accuracy from a FR perspective.....partially nullifying their argument that "all class [insert A-H] sound better than class [insert A-H]". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Class AB vs D
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
