Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical & Installation
Circuit Breakers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scottrc5391" data-source="post: 370555" data-attributes="member: 551678"><p>I don't disagree with you about the great reliability of fuses, but I find nothing wrong with circuit breakers. I mean, if circuit breakers are the primary electrical protection in houses, then they must be good enough for cars. I use my circuit breaker as a switch for when I mess with the amp and although this isn't their intended function, I don't see how this could really hurt it. I mean, most people with breakers in their cars probably have them because they have blown a lot of fuses and run a lot of power. Why would they make the breakers so cheap that they can't be thrown many times (or switched) and still be reliable/safe. Seems like one of their main purposes. Maybe it would be a good idea to put a main fuse (bigger than breaker, but less current capability than battery/alt. could produce) just incase the breaker wasn't thrown? The most careless thing people do is to fuse near the amp instead of within inches to the + on the battery and some people don't fuse at all. I say a breaker is good enough (and should be better it seems if they behave like house breakers and you pay $20+ for one), but that is my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scottrc5391, post: 370555, member: 551678"] I don't disagree with you about the great reliability of fuses, but I find nothing wrong with circuit breakers. I mean, if circuit breakers are the primary electrical protection in houses, then they must be good enough for cars. I use my circuit breaker as a switch for when I mess with the amp and although this isn't their intended function, I don't see how this could really hurt it. I mean, most people with breakers in their cars probably have them because they have blown a lot of fuses and run a lot of power. Why would they make the breakers so cheap that they can't be thrown many times (or switched) and still be reliable/safe. Seems like one of their main purposes. Maybe it would be a good idea to put a main fuse (bigger than breaker, but less current capability than battery/alt. could produce) just incase the breaker wasn't thrown? The most careless thing people do is to fuse near the amp instead of within inches to the + on the battery and some people don't fuse at all. I say a breaker is good enough (and should be better it seems if they behave like house breakers and you pay $20+ for one), but that is my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical & Installation
Circuit Breakers
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list