Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Changed my subwoofer set up. Opinions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FtheNutHuggers" data-source="post: 7445170" data-attributes="member: 632254"><p>None of them will give you even a rough idea of what you'll hear. Plus, comparing an SC300 to an IS300 is literally the proverbial "apples to oranges" comparison. The IS does not have a gas tank between the trunk and cabin, if my memory serves me right, it has a ski access hole. That alone is the largest factor separating the two vehicle types, aside from the axial length difference between both headrest positions and the rear seat, cross sectional area of the cabin and the effective tapering of the waveguide extension of the cabin. The loss factors of the aditional set of doors on the IS also further separate the two models. For this specific vehicle/application, you picked a very poor sub for a street pounder if you expect musicality along with a peak spl #. Trunk geometry and a few other contingencies make the SC300 and SC400 very difficult to work with. The application itself will keep most anything from shining, but there are many subs out there that will better perform, musically, than your sub of choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FtheNutHuggers, post: 7445170, member: 632254"] None of them will give you even a rough idea of what you'll hear. Plus, comparing an SC300 to an IS300 is literally the proverbial "apples to oranges" comparison. The IS does not have a gas tank between the trunk and cabin, if my memory serves me right, it has a ski access hole. That alone is the largest factor separating the two vehicle types, aside from the axial length difference between both headrest positions and the rear seat, cross sectional area of the cabin and the effective tapering of the waveguide extension of the cabin. The loss factors of the aditional set of doors on the IS also further separate the two models. For this specific vehicle/application, you picked a very poor sub for a street pounder if you expect musicality along with a peak spl #. Trunk geometry and a few other contingencies make the SC300 and SC400 very difficult to work with. The application itself will keep most anything from shining, but there are many subs out there that will better perform, musically, than your sub of choice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Changed my subwoofer set up. Opinions?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list