Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThxOne" data-source="post: 8921221" data-attributes="member: 675210">No attitude at all. There is no emotion attached to text. That is why we invented colorful metaphors. I have no reason to have an attitude. I am thinking all the arguing in the off topic thread has kept everyone on edge so they just expect attitude from everyone. I assure you, I am in no way upset or with attitude. I have been slacking way off on posting in there. As you can see, as many of us has said before, the root of the arguments is still posting loud and proud. Always in opposition to continue the drama. My point here was that a broad censor limits what can be shared with other members and all for what? Because some guy in MN can&#039;t stop making people on this forum mad or can&#039;t stop insulting people in the highest office in the land? You think that can&#039;t be flagged or watched by outside sources? How many times can a person call the President a SP or R*pist before it lands on someones desk?Also... it&#039;s not all about cussing. Some words get censored because people think they are cuss words or are ashamed to speak them. Like *****. A female dog. Known in most of the world. ***, a Donkey. You get my point. I would say as long as people aren&#039;t directing specific words AT people then we should be fine. One would hope anyway. I am sorry if I came off as having an attitude. I promise, there was none.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThxOne, post: 8921221, member: 675210"] No attitude at all. There is no emotion attached to text. That is why we invented colorful metaphors. I have no reason to have an attitude. I am thinking all the arguing in the off topic thread has kept everyone on edge so they just expect attitude from everyone. I assure you, I am in no way upset or with attitude. I have been slacking way off on posting in there. As you can see, as many of us has said before, the root of the arguments is still posting loud and proud. Always in opposition to continue the drama. My point here was that a broad censor limits what can be shared with other members and all for what? Because some guy in MN can't stop making people on this forum mad or can't stop insulting people in the highest office in the land? You think that can't be flagged or watched by outside sources? How many times can a person call the President a SP or R*pist before it lands on someones desk? Also... it's not all about cussing. Some words get censored because people think they are cuss words or are ashamed to speak them. Like *****. A female dog. Known in most of the world. ***, a Donkey. You get my point. I would say as long as people aren't directing specific words AT people then we should be fine. One would hope anyway. I am sorry if I came off as having an attitude. I promise, there was none. [/QUOTE]

Verification