Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Censorship
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nudels" data-source="post: 7898592" data-attributes="member: 634950"><p>yessir,.. it was a rather well devised experiment by juancolchado, sound_around (coma_toast), and myself to prove exactly how the mods operate here with a bias to those who have the cash to pad their pockets, or the clout to reciprocate a favor or two, or three, or four. (holic and tommyk are immediate exceptions, though) additionally, it appeared that we were the exception to the rule as our section was trolled by members who willingly supported ant for the alphadump (yep, i was the first to use that line) giveaway in hopes to gain brownie points/free deadener, yet noone was subject to disciplinary action however many times the thread was monitored by staff. we never deleted those posts as we did not believe in hiding what people say, however ill-contrived they could be. it prob didnt help that mot had/has a hard-on for sound_around the whole time... im sure he's still here, too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p>part of our reasoning to do so was that we have a very high intolerance to scammers, liars, dips<em>h</em>it wanna-be trolls, vendors/sellers who take advantage to con others, and mods who blatantly abuse their power to pander to the needs of shady folk. still to this day, i am loyal to the members (the good ones) who make up the c/a community to move it forward, and i will do whatever is within my power to expose these people for what they are. trust me, we're the good guys, but ca.com didnt see it that way,.. they had to take the first opportunity to ban juan who used his pp account to buy the section as the means to get rid of him and the section attached to him,..</p><p></p><p>the funniest thing was, is that mot immediately banned juan (he was the only one on that night) and subsequently had the section later deleted for something i posted in reply to holic while using the vendor account, being that we were partners, and all,.. an intelligent mod would have checked the ip's first and found that that specific post belonged to a verizon ip from chicagoland that matched mine and all of my prior posts' (lo-ki/honkyg), while juan always had an at&amp;t account in the miami area,.. yet i was never banned.</p><p></p><p>mission accomplished.</p><p></p><p>waaaaaait for it!,......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nudels, post: 7898592, member: 634950"] yessir,.. it was a rather well devised experiment by juancolchado, sound_around (coma_toast), and myself to prove exactly how the mods operate here with a bias to those who have the cash to pad their pockets, or the clout to reciprocate a favor or two, or three, or four. (holic and tommyk are immediate exceptions, though) additionally, it appeared that we were the exception to the rule as our section was trolled by members who willingly supported ant for the alphadump (yep, i was the first to use that line) giveaway in hopes to gain brownie points/free deadener, yet noone was subject to disciplinary action however many times the thread was monitored by staff. we never deleted those posts as we did not believe in hiding what people say, however ill-contrived they could be. it prob didnt help that mot had/has a hard-on for sound_around the whole time... im sure he's still here, too [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] part of our reasoning to do so was that we have a very high intolerance to scammers, liars, dips[I]h[/I]it wanna-be trolls, vendors/sellers who take advantage to con others, and mods who blatantly abuse their power to pander to the needs of shady folk. still to this day, i am loyal to the members (the good ones) who make up the c/a community to move it forward, and i will do whatever is within my power to expose these people for what they are. trust me, we're the good guys, but ca.com didnt see it that way,.. they had to take the first opportunity to ban juan who used his pp account to buy the section as the means to get rid of him and the section attached to him,.. the funniest thing was, is that mot immediately banned juan (he was the only one on that night) and subsequently had the section later deleted for something i posted in reply to holic while using the vendor account, being that we were partners, and all,.. an intelligent mod would have checked the ip's first and found that that specific post belonged to a verizon ip from chicagoland that matched mine and all of my prior posts' (lo-ki/honkyg), while juan always had an at&t account in the miami area,.. yet i was never banned. mission accomplished. waaaaaait for it!,...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Censorship
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
