Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="madshoe" data-source="post: 427584" data-attributes="member: 547467">^^the 62 model looks like a great idea!&nbsp; ...especially if you let me buy your old pair! (email sent)Anyone know the difference between cl-61 and cl-61a? I went to <a href="http://www.cdtaudio.com/classic2000MidDriv.htm" target="_blank">http://www.cdtaudio.com/classic2000MidDriv.htm</a> and still can&#039;t figure it out.Not to *****, but I need help deciding on Alpine Type S, Type R, or CDT audio CL-61a. I&#039;m still considering the S because of it&#039;s better sensitivity of 90 on component model and 92 on coaxial model. Also it plays 5 hz lower than the R. Think i would notice 5hz and a couple db&#039;s sensitivity? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.giftheZeb.com has the 61a for $149 and supposedly free shipping, and Alpine stuff either off ebay or ikesound.com.everyones .02 cents welcome.Thank You,Alberto</blockquote>

[QUOTE="madshoe, post: 427584, member: 547467"] ^^the 62 model looks like a great idea! ...especially if you let me buy your old pair! (email sent) Anyone know the difference between cl-61 and cl-61a? I went to [URL="http://www.cdtaudio.com/classic2000MidDriv.htm"]http://www.cdtaudio.com/classic2000MidDriv.htm[/URL] and still can't figure it out. Not to *****, but I need help deciding on Alpine [B]Type S[/B], [B]Type R[/B], or [B]CDT audio [/B] CL-61a. I'm still considering the S because of it's better sensitivity of 90 on component model and 92 on coaxial model. Also it plays 5 hz lower than the R. Think i would notice 5hz and a couple db's sensitivity? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] theZeb.com has the 61a for $149 and supposedly free shipping, and Alpine stuff either off ebay or ikesound.com. everyones .02 cents welcome. Thank You, Alberto [/QUOTE]

Verification