Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="digital mint" data-source="post: 1565985" data-attributes="member: 561265">I had both. Properly installed and with at least 175 watts, the ID&#039;s are a better choice for me. The midbass are so much stronger. With my setup (XXX15),the IDs are able to catch those 55-70 hz notes that my XXX lacks of. With less than 150 watts then i would go with the CDTs. My point about&nbsp; power is that with not enough power you won&#039;t get the full potential of the IDs.The IDs are pretty big mids, just make sure they will fit both in diameter and depth. Even tho they&#039;re advertized as 6.5, they&#039;re actually closer to 7&quot;On the other hand, the CDTs are more upgradable (Crossover, tweets).I&#039;m gonna side with squeak on that one. I think CDTs are overrated and overpriced. They are better/cheaper options. Can&#039;t say it enough tho install is everything. Took me 3 times before i got it right.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="digital mint, post: 1565985, member: 561265"] I had both. Properly installed and with at least 175 watts, the ID's are a better choice for me. The midbass are so much stronger. With my setup (XXX15),the IDs are able to catch those 55-70 hz notes that my XXX lacks of. With less than 150 watts then i would go with the CDTs. My point about power is that with not enough power you won't get the full potential of the IDs. The IDs are pretty big mids, just make sure they will fit both in diameter and depth. Even tho they're advertized as 6.5, they're actually closer to 7" On the other hand, the CDTs are more upgradable (Crossover, tweets). I'm gonna side with squeak on that one. I think CDTs are overrated and overpriced. They are better/cheaper options. Can't say it enough tho [B]install is everything[/B]. Took me 3 times before i got it right. [/QUOTE]

Verification