Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="anwaypasible" data-source="post: 7095879" data-attributes="member: 627657">i do have a question.. why are you being such a small minded idiot about the electronic characteristics of capacitors?is it because you have learned some &#039;advanced&#039; pieces of knowledge and can no longer provide to the community because your theories are out-dated?!i&#039;m thinking that is exactly what is going on.. otherwise you would be worse with that much energy to derive the science of the technology.you sound like you are talking about technology that you have read from books that go back to the era of 1960.to argue about what i said on how each event a capacitor goes through has a name for the characteristic.. you are making yourself into a troll and a flamer.your efforts will not continue to mislead the people now that this post has shed light on your illicit methods.by taking whatever characteristics you want to derive a capacitor that fits your needs is pathetic and doesnt justify the science of the technology as my original post does.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="anwaypasible, post: 7095879, member: 627657"] i do have a question.. why are you being such a small minded idiot about the electronic characteristics of capacitors? is it because you have learned some 'advanced' pieces of knowledge and can no longer provide to the community because your theories are out-dated?! i'm thinking that is exactly what is going on.. otherwise you would be worse with that much energy to derive the science of the technology. you sound like you are talking about technology that you have read from books that go back to the era of 1960. to argue about what i said on how each event a capacitor goes through has a name for the characteristic.. you are making yourself into a troll and a flamer. your efforts will not continue to mislead the people now that this post has shed light on your illicit methods. by taking whatever characteristics you want to derive a capacitor that fits your needs is pathetic and doesnt justify the science of the technology as my original post does. [/QUOTE]

Verification