Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Louisiana_CRX" data-source="post: 2226704" data-attributes="member: 570083"><p>I haven&#039;t gotten the chance to read all this...but the reason DD got rated so low is the idiots put it in the wrong ported box....They put it in a 1.5 cuft box they claimed slot ported so the box should&#039;ve been about a 2cuft box including port...they used an 18in square port...which is 36 total....if it was the maximum box which I doubt it was it needed 24.....if it was only 1.5 including port they would&#039;ve needed 18 total not square...I can&#039;t speak for the other speakers...because I&#039;m not familiar with their specs...So if they were this far off on the test box for DD ...who&#039;s to say the other may be as well...The box the described would make a DD sound like crap...I&#039;m really suprised it rated as well as it did...Put them in the right box for he right application the subs are unbeatable...oh their box would&#039;ve been tuned good for SPL...if it had the right box placement....</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Louisiana_CRX, post: 2226704, member: 570083"] I haven't gotten the chance to read all this...but the reason DD got rated so low is the idiots put it in the wrong ported box....They put it in a 1.5 cuft box they claimed slot ported so the box should've been about a 2cuft box including port...they used an 18in square port...which is 36 total....if it was the maximum box which I doubt it was it needed 24.....if it was only 1.5 including port they would've needed 18 total not square...I can't speak for the other speakers...because I'm not familiar with their specs...So if they were this far off on the test box for DD ...who's to say the other may be as well...The box the described would make a DD sound like crap...I'm really suprised it rated as well as it did...Put them in the right box for he right application the subs are unbeatable...oh their box would've been tuned good for SPL...if it had the right box placement.... [/QUOTE]

Verification