Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Bush at his best
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PollyCranopolis" data-source="post: 2343104" data-attributes="member: 553423"><p>* Why should we spend millions of our tax dollars to assimilate people who are here illegally? That is, breaking the law by being in the country?</p><p></p><p>*The Geneva convention definition of tourture states "Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment" shall not be allowed. One could concievably argue that simple interogation procedures such as bright lights, loud and foul lnguage, and harsh questions could constitue this. Just how are we supposed to interogate prisoners? Are we even allowed to in any form under such broad guidlines? Very vague and broad definition, definitely not clear cut enough.</p><p></p><p>*Late term abortions? Many doctors define abortion as terminance of a pregnancy all the way up until the unbilical cord is cut. Your saying the woman should be allowed to terminate a late term preganancy at any time, including once the child has been birthed, as long as the chord has not been cut? What about several days before giving birth to a healthy, fully developed baby?</p><p></p><p>*Many teachers unions are faulty under the premise that there is absolutely no competition, or set requirements members must reach from an educational standpoint. Lazy teachers make the same wage as outstanding one's, while the students unlucky enough to get stuck with a lame duck suffer. They have abosultely no accountability to the taxpayer, who in turn pay their salaries, to educate thier children to agreeable standards.</p><p></p><p>*There is absolutely no "physical" money goverment social security accounts right now. The current system is basically a huge slush fund that politicians raid on a yearly basis, leaving behind IOU's for future generations. Americans need the ability to invest at least a portion of thier money into accounts that can not be raided by goverment, and that they themselves have individual control over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PollyCranopolis, post: 2343104, member: 553423"] * Why should we spend millions of our tax dollars to assimilate people who are here illegally? That is, breaking the law by being in the country? *The Geneva convention definition of tourture states "Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment" shall not be allowed. One could concievably argue that simple interogation procedures such as bright lights, loud and foul lnguage, and harsh questions could constitue this. Just how are we supposed to interogate prisoners? Are we even allowed to in any form under such broad guidlines? Very vague and broad definition, definitely not clear cut enough. *Late term abortions? Many doctors define abortion as terminance of a pregnancy all the way up until the unbilical cord is cut. Your saying the woman should be allowed to terminate a late term preganancy at any time, including once the child has been birthed, as long as the chord has not been cut? What about several days before giving birth to a healthy, fully developed baby? *Many teachers unions are faulty under the premise that there is absolutely no competition, or set requirements members must reach from an educational standpoint. Lazy teachers make the same wage as outstanding one's, while the students unlucky enough to get stuck with a lame duck suffer. They have abosultely no accountability to the taxpayer, who in turn pay their salaries, to educate thier children to agreeable standards. *There is absolutely no "physical" money goverment social security accounts right now. The current system is basically a huge slush fund that politicians raid on a yearly basis, leaving behind IOU's for future generations. Americans need the ability to invest at least a portion of thier money into accounts that can not be raided by goverment, and that they themselves have individual control over. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Bush at his best
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list