Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
built in crossovers - why!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lusso5" data-source="post: 316410" data-attributes="member: 549868"><p>"Moderate sonic benefits" is what I've been told. In a car (crappy acoustics) - I'm not going to waste my time, or another set of channels.</p><p></p><p>I guess the bi-amping I was talking about (crossover only) could be considered passive bi-amping, while the commonly discussed and used term "bi-amping" could accurately be described as active bi-amping (even though you'll still need a passive HPF for the tweets, but anyways). If they needed to be differed (which this thread is probably the only case they ever will need to be...LOL)</p><p></p><p>I know what you were talking about though, referring to "bi-amping". I was just talking x-overs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lusso5, post: 316410, member: 549868"] "Moderate sonic benefits" is what I've been told. In a car (crappy acoustics) - I'm not going to waste my time, or another set of channels. I guess the bi-amping I was talking about (crossover only) could be considered passive bi-amping, while the commonly discussed and used term "bi-amping" could accurately be described as active bi-amping (even though you'll still need a passive HPF for the tweets, but anyways). If they needed to be differed (which this thread is probably the only case they ever will need to be...LOL) I know what you were talking about though, referring to "bi-amping". I was just talking x-overs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
built in crossovers - why!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
