Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Build a box for me $$
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mr Cabinetry" data-source="post: 4809925" data-attributes="member: 571490"><p>The port does take into account the xmax, cone to excursion displacement and power = vent mach.</p><p></p><p>Now, way back when the arguments, debates and discussions were going on about vent mach, port velocity, laminar flow and all that good goofy business was " what is the acceptable ratio of air movement thru the port?".</p><p></p><p>The consensus was .20 meters per sec or 65 ft per sec, anything above those numbers was considered " too fa king high " which is total bullsh!t because that would mean the port area takes precedent over any other design element given the max size the enclosure cannot exceed or design limitations the enclosure needs to fit within the install.</p><p></p><p>However, conforming to the established " NORM's " means " one must adhere to and not deviate and anything other is subject to speculation ".</p><p></p><p>Specifications, Requirements, Fit, Function and Design = All Covered. Job Done.</p><p></p><p>Customer = The Final Word.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mr Cabinetry, post: 4809925, member: 571490"] The port does take into account the xmax, cone to excursion displacement and power = vent mach. Now, way back when the arguments, debates and discussions were going on about vent mach, port velocity, laminar flow and all that good goofy business was " what is the acceptable ratio of air movement thru the port?". The consensus was .20 meters per sec or 65 ft per sec, anything above those numbers was considered " too fa king high " which is total bullsh!t because that would mean the port area takes precedent over any other design element given the max size the enclosure cannot exceed or design limitations the enclosure needs to fit within the install. However, conforming to the established " NORM's " means " one must adhere to and not deviate and anything other is subject to speculation ". Specifications, Requirements, Fit, Function and Design = All Covered. Job Done. Customer = The Final Word. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Build a box for me $$
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list