Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fantomas" data-source="post: 222347" data-attributes="member: 542363">good point, but i think in order to be put on trial in the first place, there must already be substantial evidence against you to begin with. DNA is just used to confirm that the murderer actually did the murder. and yes, there have been tons of mistakes and its not fullproof. and i do agree that is better to save the 1 innocent man from being killed along with 99 guilty men then to kill all 100. It usually costs more to put someone to death than to leave them in prison for life.i don't think DNA should be the only evidence against someone in order to put them to death.</blockquote>

Top