Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
box rise question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LBC" data-source="post: 7901034" data-attributes="member: 641642"><p>I made the statement that the real world impedence curve cannot be calculated.... not what you are trying to frame my argument as. Everything you have thus far posted has confirmed what I've said. You are continuing to behave as though you are correct in saying I was wrong. Thus you're lying to save face. You have proven yourself wrong several times. You have accused me of being mad when I'm not. not even close to mad actually. I find your whole charade to be quite entertaining.</p><p></p><p>Also, winisd predicts the impedence to be highest at the peak frequency of the enclosure. The impedence spikes sub-30 on both of your graphs there. On the winisd prediction it assumes 5.2 ohms. On your "real world" measurement you get to exactly 4 ohms. The winisd predicts about 28hz. "Real world" is about 24hz. You have cited 2hz but your graphs show otherwise. Also the slopes, the bandwidth between peaks, EVERYTHING is different. It not just slightly off. It's quite far off. They simply look similar at first glance. You either have absolutely no idea what you're talking about or you're trolling. I haven't figured out which yet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LBC, post: 7901034, member: 641642"] I made the statement that the real world impedence curve cannot be calculated.... not what you are trying to frame my argument as. Everything you have thus far posted has confirmed what I've said. You are continuing to behave as though you are correct in saying I was wrong. Thus you're lying to save face. You have proven yourself wrong several times. You have accused me of being mad when I'm not. not even close to mad actually. I find your whole charade to be quite entertaining. Also, winisd predicts the impedence to be highest at the peak frequency of the enclosure. The impedence spikes sub-30 on both of your graphs there. On the winisd prediction it assumes 5.2 ohms. On your "real world" measurement you get to exactly 4 ohms. The winisd predicts about 28hz. "Real world" is about 24hz. You have cited 2hz but your graphs show otherwise. Also the slopes, the bandwidth between peaks, EVERYTHING is different. It not just slightly off. It's quite far off. They simply look similar at first glance. You either have absolutely no idea what you're talking about or you're trolling. I haven't figured out which yet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
box rise question
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list