Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Box Build for IamDeMan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IamDeMan" data-source="post: 3228653" data-attributes="member: 557673"><p>Exactly and the mass will be correct provided the MEDIAN length and area is correct. Which is why I worded it that way. There is nothing in the formula that says continuity has to be kept or that it has to symmetrical. The mass is correct plain and simply put. The calculation is NOT off. It is still the desired mass. Having a slant at one end or a bend in it doesn't change the equation //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif My median length(average of longest length and shorted length) is still the desired measurement making the total mass correct. It's basic mathematics. It is probably easier to tune with both sides having the same degree of angle, but it isn't a necessity to achieve the same desired results. Just involves slightly more figuring.</p><p></p><p>If what you are saying were correct, then my internal volume for woofer cavity would be off too because the top has less length than bottom, so it throws off the equation slightly. It makes no sense whatsoever. Mass is mass no matter if lengths on all walls is same or not. You add them up and you get a number.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IamDeMan, post: 3228653, member: 557673"] Exactly and the mass will be correct provided the MEDIAN length and area is correct. Which is why I worded it that way. There is nothing in the formula that says continuity has to be kept or that it has to symmetrical. The mass is correct plain and simply put. The calculation is NOT off. It is still the desired mass. Having a slant at one end or a bend in it doesn't change the equation [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif[/IMG] My median length(average of longest length and shorted length) is still the desired measurement making the total mass correct. It's basic mathematics. It is probably easier to tune with both sides having the same degree of angle, but it isn't a necessity to achieve the same desired results. Just involves slightly more figuring. If what you are saying were correct, then my internal volume for woofer cavity would be off too because the top has less length than bottom, so it throws off the equation slightly. It makes no sense whatsoever. Mass is mass no matter if lengths on all walls is same or not. You add them up and you get a number. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Box Build for IamDeMan
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list