Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Bigbangtheory........?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MmatsDude" data-source="post: 5467529" data-attributes="member: 586264"><p>If I am getting this right, you are saying that faith covers cases of uncertainty...where there is no obligation to produce reasons and/or justifications for holding or acting on 'such and such' belief. Yet, sir, I am apprehending that there must be a dividing line where this 'general faith' must end - right? say, a person's having faith in the promise of God's redemption of one's sins and eternal life everlasting? It seems to me that this is a critical loophole...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MmatsDude, post: 5467529, member: 586264"] If I am getting this right, you are saying that faith covers cases of uncertainty...where there is no obligation to produce reasons and/or justifications for holding or acting on 'such and such' belief. Yet, sir, I am apprehending that there must be a dividing line where this 'general faith' must end - right? say, a person's having faith in the promise of God's redemption of one's sins and eternal life everlasting? It seems to me that this is a critical loophole... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Bigbangtheory........?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list