Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
Best double din in 2017
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8573696" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>The kenwood uses a superior DAC. The function is pretty much simplified on the kenwood. its not really less tuning power just more simplified. If i remember correctly.. It does do somewhat of a network mode as you can set the fronts to tweeter and rears to midrange though you might have to cross the midrange with a low pass filter.</p><p></p><p>If i could do it again. I'd get the high resolution kenwood unit and a cadence processor for a budget orientated setup.. another good option that's super cheap and would give you much more processing power over the no so great sounding pioneer are the mini DSPs</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/digital-signal-processors-dsp/minidsp-2x4-hd-usb-dac-and-digital-signal-processor/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwmv7JBRDXkMWW4_Tf8ZoBEiQA11B2fqWX_Ggpq2AFydyhwTcpolkjkcgc5scxw07KP1lNTBEaAtTQ8P8HAQ" target="_blank">https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/digital-signal-processors-dsp/minidsp-2x4-hd-usb-dac-and-digital-signal-processor/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwmv7JBRDXkMWW4_Tf8ZoBEiQA11B2fqWX_Ggpq2AFydyhwTcpolkjkcgc5scxw07KP1lNTBEaAtTQ8P8HAQ</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8573696, member: 572595"] The kenwood uses a superior DAC. The function is pretty much simplified on the kenwood. its not really less tuning power just more simplified. If i remember correctly.. It does do somewhat of a network mode as you can set the fronts to tweeter and rears to midrange though you might have to cross the midrange with a low pass filter. If i could do it again. I'd get the high resolution kenwood unit and a cadence processor for a budget orientated setup.. another good option that's super cheap and would give you much more processing power over the no so great sounding pioneer are the mini DSPs [URL="https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/digital-signal-processors-dsp/minidsp-2x4-hd-usb-dac-and-digital-signal-processor/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwmv7JBRDXkMWW4_Tf8ZoBEiQA11B2fqWX_Ggpq2AFydyhwTcpolkjkcgc5scxw07KP1lNTBEaAtTQ8P8HAQ"]https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/digital-signal-processors-dsp/minidsp-2x4-hd-usb-dac-and-digital-signal-processor/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwmv7JBRDXkMWW4_Tf8ZoBEiQA11B2fqWX_Ggpq2AFydyhwTcpolkjkcgc5scxw07KP1lNTBEaAtTQ8P8HAQ[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
Best double din in 2017
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
